Litigation Cases
Coverage since January 1, 2026

Litigation

Uncategorized

DJCBP Corp. v. City of Baldwin Park — C.D. Cal. Awards $247K in Attorney’s Fees on $1.6M Fraud Verdict, Declining Lodestar Multiplier

Judge Christina Snyder awarded $247,897 in attorneys’ fees and $4,037 in costs to plaintiffs after a $1.6 million fraud verdict against former Baldwin Park City Attorney Tafoya, but declined to apply any lodestar multiplier — finding the legal issues were not extraordinary, counsel displayed o

Uncategorized

Yamamoto v. Federal Express Corp. — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of Class-Action Wage Suit Where CAFA Amount in Controversy and Diversity Are Established

Judge Percy Anderson denied remand of a FedEx wage-and-hour class action, holding CAFA’s minimal diversity and $5 million amount-in-controversy thresholds were both established by conservative assumptions and workforce evidence. The court rejected plaintiff’s Sonner argument because the

Uncategorized

Pirro v. U.S. Bank — C.D. Cal. Remands FEHA Whistleblower Suit, Holding Self-Serving Denial Cannot Defeat Aiding-and-Abetting Claim Against In-State Defendant

Judge Dale S. Fischer remanded a FEHA whistleblower-retaliation suit against U.S. Bank, holding that Bogaski’s self-serving denial declaration could not establish fraudulent joinder where the plaintiff could possibly amend to allege the FEHA aiding-and-abetting elements (knowledge plus substan

Uncategorized

Perez v. Arroyo Building Materials — C.D. Cal. Issues OSC on Supplemental Jurisdiction Over Unruh Act Claim by High-Frequency ADA Litigant

Judge Fernando Aenlle-Rocha ordered serial ADA plaintiff German Perez to show cause why the court should not decline supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim under Schutza v. Cuddeback, requiring a declaration on his high-frequency-litigant status under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 425.55.

Uncategorized

Shawn Michael H. v. Bisignano — C.D. Cal. Reverses Social Security Denial Where Vocational Expert Failed to Resolve DOT Conflict on Walking and Standing

Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott reversed a Social Security denial because the vocational expert failed to explain how the claimant — who could not walk or stand for six hours — could perform the ‘light work’ alternative jobs identified, where the DOT’s definition of light work pote

Uncategorized

Koeller v. Nixplay — N.D. Cal. denies remand of CLRA digital photo frame consumer suit, finds complete diversity despite shifting corporate citizenship allegations

Magistrate Judge DeMarchi denies remand of a putative class action by Nixplay digital-photo-frame customers, holding that complete diversity exists between the plaintiffs and Nixplay, Inc. (Delaware/U.K.) and Creedon Technologies USA, LLC (Hong Kong via its sole member), even though defendants’ init

Scroll to Top