Litigation Cases
Coverage since January 1, 2026

Litigation

Uncategorized

Sumner v. Commissioner of Social Security — E.D. Cal. Reverses Mental RFC Denial Where ALJ Disregarded Treating Psychiatrist and ER Visits

Eastern District of California reverses an SSDI denial for a veteran with bipolar disorder, PTSD, and central sleep apnea, holding that the ALJ failed to support a mental residual functional capacity finding with substantial evidence and mischaracterized the claimant’s daily activities.

Uncategorized

Gifford v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of GMC Sierra 2500 Lemon-Law Suit Where Mileage Offset Erodes Damages but Civil Penalties and Repair History Save Federal Jurisdiction

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2019 GMC Sierra 2500 lemon-law case, holding documented actual damages of $41,341 plus civil penalties (twice actual damages, supported by nine unsuccessful repair attempts) brought the amount in controversy to roughly $124,023 — well over the $7

Uncategorized

Riley’s American Heritage Farms v. Claremont Unified School District — C.D. Cal. Enters Judgment for School District After Bench Trial on First Amendment Retaliation Field-Trip Claims

After two Ninth Circuit reversals, Judge Jesus G. Bernal entered judgment for Claremont Unified School District following a bench trial in this First Amendment retaliation case, finding the cancelled and reduced field trips to Riley’s Farm reflected parental consent withdrawals (mandated by Ca

Uncategorized

Real v. Amazon Retail LLC — C.D. Cal. Sua Sponte Remands Wrongful-Termination Suit, Refusing to Credit Speculative Damages and Reiterating Federalism Critique

Judge David O. Carter sua sponte remanded an Amazon employee’s wrongful-termination suit, refusing to credit speculative emotional-distress, punitive, and attorneys’ fees damages — leaving roughly $71,780 in calculated wages and vacation, just under the $75,000 threshold. He again called

Uncategorized

Blömqvist v. Extra Space Storage — N.D. Cal. screens ADA Title III storage-unit access claim past § 1915 but denies preliminary injunction

Magistrate Judge Lin allows pro se plaintiffs Logan Blömqvist and Todd Myers to proceed with ADA Title III and retaliation claims against Extra Space Storage over alleged denial of access to storage units in Campbell and Los Gatos, while dismissing their § 1983 claim and denying a preliminary injunc

Scroll to Top