Deutsche Bank v. Merrill — FAPA leaves 2023 foreclosure time-barred
The Second Department held that a lender’s voluntary discontinuance did not reset an accelerated mortgage debt’s limitations period under the Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act.
The Second Department held that a lender’s voluntary discontinuance did not reset an accelerated mortgage debt’s limitations period under the Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act.
The Second Department held reverse-mortgage owners equitably estopped from asserting limitations where repeated occupancy certifications caused the lender’s delay.
The Second Department held, in a case of first impression, that land wholly owned by a trust and an LLC is not heirs property under RPAPL 993.