EBF Holdings v. Defiant Arms — Revenue purchase upheld, but guarantor judgment vacated
The Fourth Department upheld a receivables-purchase claim against the merchant but vacated judgment against its owner because the limited guaranty was not proved.
The Fourth Department upheld a receivables-purchase claim against the merchant but vacated judgment against its owner because the limited guaranty was not proved.
The Fourth Department affirms that a merchant cash advance structured as a revenue purchase agreement is not a usurious loan under New York law, applying the three-factor test of reconciliation provisions, finite term, and bankruptcy recourse.