Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided): –
Coverage since January 2, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Business Transactions

Ninth Circuit
Uncategorized

Panelli v. Target Corporation — Ninth Circuit revives California consumer class action over allegedly impossible 800-thread-count cotton sheets, holding a literally false claim can deceive even when its falsity is verifiable

The Ninth Circuit reverses dismissal of a California consumer class action against Target over allegedly impossible 800-thread-count cotton sheets, holding that the literally false advertising framework applies when a label is unambiguous and that a physically impossible claim can still deceive a re

Ninth Circuit
Uncategorized

Brown v. The Brita Products Company — Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of California consumer suit, holding no reasonable consumer expects a $15 water filter to remove every contaminant

The Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of a California consumer class action against Brita, holding that no reasonable consumer would expect a low-cost water filter to remove every common contaminant when the packaging only claims to ‘reduce’ specific listed contaminants and directs buyers

4th District Court of Appeal, Division Three
Uncategorized

NNN Capital Fund I, LLC v. Mikles — Standing of Purported LLC Representatives Is a Jurisdictional Issue That May Be Raised at Any Time, Including After Arbitration

Fourth District vacates judgment confirming arbitration award and remands for the trial court to determine whether the purported liquidating trustees who brought the action on behalf of an LLC had standing under the company’s operating agreement, holding that jurisdictional standing may be cha

4th District Court of Appeal, Division One
Uncategorized

Gonzalez v. Community Mortuary — Impracticability of Performance Is an Equitable Defense Tried to the Court, Not the Jury

Fourth District holds that impracticability of performance is an equitable defense that must be tried to the court rather than the jury and reverses a defense verdict in a breach of contract case arising from a Texas mortuary’s body mix-up that resulted in the wrong body being buried in San Di

2nd District Court of Appeal, Division One
Uncategorized

Jogani v. Jogani — $6.85 Billion Verdict in Brothers’ Real-Estate Partnership Suit Conditionally Affirmed; Lost-Profits Expert Testimony Excluded

Second District conditionally affirms a $6.85 billion verdict in a five-month trial over the Jogani brothers’ real-estate partnership, but orders a remittitur because Shashi Jogani’s damages expert testified to an undisclosed lost-profits opinion exceeding $1.9 billion.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Division Eight
Uncategorized

Diaz v. Thor Motor Coach — Out-of-State Forum-Selection Clause in RV Warranty Unenforceable Against Song-Beverly Claim Even With Stipulation Preserving California Law

Second District reverses an order staying a Song-Beverly action against Thor Motor Coach, holding the warranty’s Indiana forum-selection clause is unenforceable even when accompanied by a stipulation that California law would govern.

4th District Court of Appeal, Division Three
Uncategorized

Grant v. Chapman University — University Statements About On-Campus Education Are Not Specific Enough to Form an Implied Promise of In-Person Instruction

Fourth District affirms summary judgment for Chapman University in a COVID-19 tuition-refund case, holding that the university’s general descriptions of campus facilities and ‘face-to-face’ contact were not specific enough to form an enforceable implied promise of in-person educati

4th District Court of Appeal, Division One
Uncategorized

Higginson v. Kia Motors America — Trial Court Should Have Imposed Terminating Sanctions for Kia’s False Discovery Responses About Engine-Defect Records

Fourth District reverses a defense judgment in a Song-Beverly action against Kia, holding the trial court abused its discretion by accepting Kia’s false verified discovery responses about engine-defect records and failing to impose terminating sanctions when the falsity was revealed.

U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
Uncategorized

Vickery v. SD Bullion — S.D. Cal. Trims Consumer Class Action Over ‘Lowest Price. Period.’ Gold-Coin Advertising

In a putative class action alleging that SD Bullion’s ‘The Lowest Price. Period.’ advertising for precious-metal coins was false because competitors charged less, the court trimmed several theories at the motion-to-dismiss stage but allowed the consumer’s core false-advertisi

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

North Investment v. Berkower — C.D. Cal. Tosses Fraud and Aiding-and-Abetting Claims Against Accounting Firm Over False Schedule K-1s

Central District of California dismisses fraud, aiding-and-abetting, and UCL claims against an accounting firm whose Schedule K-1s wrongly indicated investors had received distributions, holding investors did not plausibly allege the firm knew the distributions never occurred when it prepared the fo

2nd District Court of Appeal, Division Four
Uncategorized

Towns v. Hyundai Motor America — Only the Buyer Has Song-Beverly Standing, but Insurance Payouts Don’t Reduce Restitution

Second District holds that under California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, only the actual buyer has standing to sue for restitution, but a manufacturer cannot reduce its restitution by the amount of a third-party insurance payout the buyer received after the car was wrecked.

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Anofienem v. WeWork — C.D. Cal. Tosses Most of Pro-Se Membership Suit and Permanently Strikes E-SIGN and Unruh Claims

Central District of California denies remand of a pro se WeWork dispute, dismisses the contract, conversion, and emotional-distress claims with leave to amend, and dismisses the federal E-SIGN Act and Unruh Act claims permanently for lack of any private right of action and missing intent allegations

U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
Uncategorized

Peachtree Orthopaedic Clinic v. Deep Seas — S.D. Cal. Trims Cybersecurity Vendor’s Counterclaim, Dismissing Fraud-in-Inducement Theory Under Economic Loss Rule

In a breach-of-contract dispute over a $160,000 fee demand following a cybersecurity vendor’s alleged failure to detect a 2023 data breach at a Georgia orthopedic clinic, the court dismissed the vendor’s counterclaim theories for fraud in the inducement, breach of the implied covenant of

U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Uncategorized

Ved v. Global Fitness Ventures — N.D. Cal. dismisses derivative suit for lack of diversity, holding LP is real party in interest

Judge Gilliam dismisses Divyang Ved’s derivative suit on behalf of Spain Fitness Ventures, LP for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, holding that the limited partnership is the real party in interest under Ross v. Bernhard and that its New Jersey citizenship — through Ved as a New Jersey limited p

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Powell v. Mercedes-Benz USA — C.D. Cal. Sua Sponte Remands Lemon-Law Suit Where Defendant’s Damages and Civil Penalty Estimates Were Speculative

Judge Anne Hwang sua sponte remanded a Mercedes-Benz lemon-law case after finding the defendant’s actual-damages calculation ignored the new January 2025 statutory offsets under Cal. Civ. Code § 871.27 and the conclusory willfulness allegation could not support adding $124,012 in civil penalti

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Gifford v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of GMC Sierra 2500 Lemon-Law Suit Where Mileage Offset Erodes Damages but Civil Penalties and Repair History Save Federal Jurisdiction

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2019 GMC Sierra 2500 lemon-law case, holding documented actual damages of $41,341 plus civil penalties (twice actual damages, supported by nine unsuccessful repair attempts) brought the amount in controversy to roughly $124,023 — well over the $7

U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Uncategorized

Trimble Inc. v. Unity Software — N.D. Cal. compels arbitration of distribution-fee dispute under AAA delegation clause

Judge Gilliam compels arbitration of Trimble’s breach-of-contract suit against Unity Software over a disputed distribution fee, holding that the AAA delegation clause in Unity’s Terms of Service sends arbitrability questions — including the scope of the agreement — to the arbitrator.

U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
Uncategorized

In re Origin Materials Securities Litigation — E.D. Cal. Preliminarily Approves $9 Million Class Action Settlement

Eastern District of California preliminarily approves a $9 million settlement of a federal securities class action against Origin Materials, Inc. and its CEO over allegedly misleading statements about the construction timeline of its Origin 1 and Origin 2 manufacturing plants.

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Velazquez-Ortega v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Lemon-Law Remand Where GM Documented Damages and Plaintiff Specifically Alleged Willfulness

Judge Sunshine Sykes denied remand of a Chevrolet Silverado lemon-law case where GM documented $67,065.58 in actual damages and plaintiff specifically alleged willfulness based on eight unsuccessful repair attempts, allowing civil penalties to push the amount in controversy to about $128,833 — well

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Vacational Bike Rentals LLC v. Kitzuma Corp. — C.D. Cal. Allows Negligence and Unjust Enrichment Claims Against Cycling Logistics Defendants Where Carmack Preemption Is Unclear

Judge Christina Snyder allowed negligence and unjust enrichment claims to proceed in a $75,000 stolen-bicycle case against Kitzuma and BikeExchange, holding that Carmack Amendment preemption could not be resolved at the motion-to-dismiss stage because the operative pleading did not clearly character

Scroll to Top