Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since January 2, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Business Transactions

Uncategorized

Comet Technologies USA v. XP Power — Ninth Circuit Vacates $40 Million Trade Secret Verdict Over Burden-of-Proof Error

The Ninth Circuit vacated a $40 million jury verdict for semiconductor component maker Comet Technologies and ordered a new trial after finding that the district court erroneously placed the burden of proving “ready ascertainability” of alleged trade secrets on XP Power rather than on Co

Uncategorized

Navaperez v. Nissan North America — Ninth Circuit Rejects Inflation-Adjusted Amount-in-Controversy Threshold in Lemon Law Removal Cases

The Ninth Circuit vacated a district court’s sua sponte remand of two California lemon law cases, holding that the $75,000 amount-in-controversy threshold is a fixed statutory requirement that cannot be adjusted for inflation, and that civil penalties and attorneys’ fees must be counted

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Deming v. County of Chautauqua — Successor-Liability Claims Against Casella Waste Survive Dismissal

The Fourth Department affirmed denial of Casella Waste Management’s motion to dismiss third-party claims arising from a fatal bulldozer accident, holding that the asset purchase agreement did not conclusively negate the Schumacher “mere continuation” and “merger” exceptions to successor corporate liability.

Ohio Court of Appeals (Fourth District)
Uncategorized

Candlewood Custom Homes v. Saunders — Fourth District affirms unjust enrichment award, rejects magistrate disqualification claim over $100 campaign contribution

The Fourth District affirmed a $20,544 unjust enrichment award and rejected a disqualification challenge based on a magistrate’s $100 campaign contribution to the political opponent of a party’s attorney, finding no appearance of impropriety.

Ninth Circuit
Uncategorized

Fang v. Hechalou US — Ninth Circuit Affirms Trademark Injunction, Holds Licensee Use Inures to Licensor Even After Rescission

The Ninth Circuit affirms a preliminary injunction against a trademark licensee who claimed priority rights, holding that a licensee’s use of marks inures to the licensor under the Lanham Act and that later rescission of the licensing agreement does not retroactively change trademark priority.

Ninth Circuit
Uncategorized

Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians v. Blanche — Ninth Circuit Holds California Cigarette Tax and Licensing Laws Apply to a Tribe’s Cigarette Sales to Other California Tribes

The Ninth Circuit affirms placement of a southern-California tribe on ATF’s PACT Act non-compliant list, holding that the tribe’s remote cigarette sales to other California tribes are off-reservation activities subject to California’s licensing and excise-tax laws.

Ninth Circuit
Uncategorized

County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania — Ninth Circuit holds policy’s aggregate limit does not apply to property damage, restoring per-occurrence coverage for Chino Airport environmental cleanup

The Ninth Circuit reverses the dismissal of the County of San Bernardino’s coverage suit against ICSOP for cleanup costs at the Chino Airport, holding that the policies’ aggregate limits provision is ambiguous and does not cap property-damage coverage.

Ninth Circuit
Uncategorized

McAuliffe v. Robinson Helicopter — Ninth Circuit holds GARA’s rolling 18-year repose period restarts for replacement parts even without substantive alteration, reviving Hawaiian crash family’s wrongful-death suit against Torrance manufacturer

The Ninth Circuit holds that GARA’s rolling provision restarts the 18-year statute of repose for replacement aircraft parts even when the new part is identical to the original, reviving a wrongful-death suit against Torrance-based Robinson Helicopter Company over a fatal Hawaiian sightseeing c

Ninth Circuit
Uncategorized

Panelli v. Target Corporation — Ninth Circuit revives California consumer class action over allegedly impossible 800-thread-count cotton sheets, holding a literally false claim can deceive even when its falsity is verifiable

The Ninth Circuit reverses dismissal of a California consumer class action against Target over allegedly impossible 800-thread-count cotton sheets, holding that the literally false advertising framework applies when a label is unambiguous and that a physically impossible claim can still deceive a re

Ninth Circuit
Uncategorized

Brown v. The Brita Products Company — Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of California consumer suit, holding no reasonable consumer expects a $15 water filter to remove every contaminant

The Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of a California consumer class action against Brita, holding that no reasonable consumer would expect a low-cost water filter to remove every common contaminant when the packaging only claims to ‘reduce’ specific listed contaminants and directs buyers

4th District Court of Appeal, Division Three
Uncategorized

NNN Capital Fund I, LLC v. Mikles — Standing of Purported LLC Representatives Is a Jurisdictional Issue That May Be Raised at Any Time, Including After Arbitration

Fourth District vacates judgment confirming arbitration award and remands for the trial court to determine whether the purported liquidating trustees who brought the action on behalf of an LLC had standing under the company’s operating agreement, holding that jurisdictional standing may be cha

4th District Court of Appeal, Division One
Uncategorized

Gonzalez v. Community Mortuary — Impracticability of Performance Is an Equitable Defense Tried to the Court, Not the Jury

Fourth District holds that impracticability of performance is an equitable defense that must be tried to the court rather than the jury and reverses a defense verdict in a breach of contract case arising from a Texas mortuary’s body mix-up that resulted in the wrong body being buried in San Di

2nd District Court of Appeal, Division One
Uncategorized

Jogani v. Jogani — $6.85 Billion Verdict in Brothers’ Real-Estate Partnership Suit Conditionally Affirmed; Lost-Profits Expert Testimony Excluded

Second District conditionally affirms a $6.85 billion verdict in a five-month trial over the Jogani brothers’ real-estate partnership, but orders a remittitur because Shashi Jogani’s damages expert testified to an undisclosed lost-profits opinion exceeding $1.9 billion.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Division Eight
Uncategorized

Diaz v. Thor Motor Coach — Out-of-State Forum-Selection Clause in RV Warranty Unenforceable Against Song-Beverly Claim Even With Stipulation Preserving California Law

Second District reverses an order staying a Song-Beverly action against Thor Motor Coach, holding the warranty’s Indiana forum-selection clause is unenforceable even when accompanied by a stipulation that California law would govern.

Scroll to Top