Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since June 1, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Class Actions

Appellate Division, Third Department
Uncategorized

Matter of Gui Zhu Chen v. Reardon — Third Department Affirms DOL Must Reopen Home Health Aide Wage Complaints, Rejects SAPA-Violating Arbitration-Closure Policy

The Appellate Division, Third Department affirmed that the Department of Labor’s blanket policy of closing home health aide wage complaints whenever a mandatory arbitration clause exists was an unlawful ‘rule’ promulgated without SAPA compliance, upholding annulment of the closures and class certification.

Appellate Division, First Department
Uncategorized

Allen v. City of New York — First Department Reinstates Class Action Challenging NYPD’s Blanket Arraignment Handcuffing Policy

The Appellate Division, First Department reversed a dismissal and reinstated a class action challenging the NYPD’s practice of routinely handcuffing all arrestees during arraignment without judicial approval, finding the policy states a viable due process claim under the New York State Constitution.

Appellate Division, Second Department
Uncategorized

Abdelhamed v. XYZ Limousine — Appellate Division Revives Black Car Drivers’ Wage Class Action

New York’s Appellate Division, Second Department reversed summary judgment for a limousine company, holding that the Labor Law “taxicab exception” does not apply to Labor Law Article 6 wage claims, and that black car drivers operating under corporate service contracts may not fall within the Article 19 exception either.

Appellate Division, Second Department
Uncategorized

Alli v. City of New York — NYPD Race-Discrimination Class Action Fails Superiority Test Under CPLR Article 9

The Appellate Division, Second Department affirms denial of class certification for Asian NYPD captains alleging race discrimination in discretionary promotions to Deputy Inspector, holding that conclusory assertions of seeking “widespread, systematic reform” are insufficient to satisfy CPLR 901(a)(5)’s superiority requirement.

Scroll to Top