In re J.P. and W.P. — Good cause permits brief CHINS deadline extensions
A divided Indiana Court of Appeals held that case-specific good cause supported brief continuances beyond CHINS factfinding deadlines and affirmed the adjudications.
A divided Indiana Court of Appeals held that case-specific good cause supported brief continuances beyond CHINS factfinding deadlines and affirmed the adjudications.
The Indiana Court of Appeals held that a former partner’s parental role and earlier voluntary contact did not overcome the fit parent’s constitutional presumption.
The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed suppression because the objective circumstances did not restrict Hoffman’s movement to the degree associated with formal arrest.