Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since June 2, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Indiana

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Uncategorized

T.R. v. Indiana DCS — Father’s Termination Reversed Where DCS Never Deployed Its Own Housing-Assistance Tools

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of a mother’s parental rights but reversed the termination of a father’s rights as to his two biological children. The father complied fully with every ordered service, held a job, and maintained consistent visitation; his only obstacle was stable housing blocked by his criminal history. Because DCS never sought a waiver for a sister-in-law’s disqualified home despite a written policy allowing it, and never followed through on deposit assistance when the father found an apartment one week before the termination hearing, the court held that DCS failed to make reasonable efforts and that proceeding to terminate his rights violated due process.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Uncategorized

Zeller v. Indiana Fire Prevention — ITCA Immunity Extends Even to Allegedly Vindictive Licensing Denials

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for state elevator-oversight agencies on all claims brought by an elevator company and its employees following years of regulatory disputes over permits, alteration orders, and reciprocal licensing. Key holdings: Indiana does not recognize a private right of action for monetary damages under the Indiana Constitution; a regulatory takings theory not pled in the complaint is waived; and ITCA immunity for discretionary licensing denials is not defeated by evidence of vindictiveness — degree of culpability is simply not a relevant consideration once immunity attaches.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Uncategorized

Hicks v. Hicks — Contingent Sale Provision Creating 4%/96% Property Split Was Abuse of Discretion When Court Found Only a Slight Deviation Warranted

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed a dissolution decree’s property division because a contingent forced-sale provision—triggered if the husband could not refinance the mortgage—would have awarded the wife 96% of the marital estate, dramatically contradicting the trial court’s own finding that only a slight deviation from equal division was warranted.

Indiana Supreme Court
Uncategorized

Wike v. Grandview Solar — BZA Solar Farm Approval Without Proper ETJ Authority Was Voidable, Not Void; 30-Day Challenge Window Applies

The Indiana Supreme Court held that a Board of Zoning Appeals’ approval of a solar-farm special exception in the town’s two-mile extraterritorial fringe—issued before the town formally authorized extraterritorial jurisdiction in its comprehensive plan—was voidable, not void; landowners who did not challenge the approval within the statutory 30-day review period waived their objection.

Indiana Supreme Court
Uncategorized

Ramos-Osario v. State — State Need Not Re-Prove Constitutional Compliance at Trial After Winning Suppression Hearing

The Indiana Supreme Court held that when the State proves the constitutionality of a search or seizure at a pretrial suppression hearing, it is not required to re-establish constitutional compliance at trial; courts assessing the stop’s validity may consider evidence from both the suppression hearing and the trial, and the exclusionary rule’s aims are fully served by requiring proof once.

Indiana Tax Court
Uncategorized

Young v. Department of Local Government Finance — Indiana Tax Court Upholds 2023 Lake County Land Order and Clarifies Scope of DLGF Review

The Indiana Tax Court affirmed the DLGF’s approval of Lake County’s 2023 land order, rejecting challenges from a pro se petitioner and an intervenor to the order’s timing, sales data sufficiency, valuation methodology, and hearing notice; the court also clarified that DLGF review under Indiana Code § 6-1.1-4-13.6 is limited to county-wide base rates and does not extend to the application of those rates to individual parcels.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Uncategorized

Blair v. Fields — GAL Report Ten-Day Deadline Runs on Calendar Days, Not Business Days; New T.R. 7(D) Governs Continuance Motions

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a custody modification to Mother, holding that a GAL report filed electronically ten calendar days before a hearing was timely — the ten-day deadline runs on calendar days, not business days — and that Indiana’s new Trial Rule 7(D) requires continuance motions to include timing estimates or risk procedural denial.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Uncategorized

White v. State — Implied Mistrial Consent Bars Double Jeopardy Defense After Three Murder Trials

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirms a murder conviction after three trials, holding that the defendant tacitly consented to the mistrial that triggered retrials by failing to object during an off-the-record chambers discussion—foreclosing his double jeopardy defense. The court also upholds a 70-year sentence and a consecutive firearm enhancement under Indiana Code section 35-50-2-11.

Scroll to Top