Case [Plaintiff Institution] v. [Defendant Insurance Company] — Electronic Device Insurance Indemnity Dispute Court Ankara Bölge Adliye Mahkemesi (Ankara Regional […]
Case Integris Insurance Company v. Narendra B. Tohan Court Connecticut Appellate Court Judge Elgo (Dannel P. Malloy, 2017) Date Decided
Fourth District holds that the Royal Globe joinder rule does not bar an additional insured city from suing both its contractor’s insurer and the contractor in the same action arising from a fatal pedestrian accident.
Case Green Rise Foods Inc. v. N.V. Hagelunie Court Court of Appeal for Ontario (Canada) Date Decided May 11, 2026
Judge Gilliam grants in part and denies in part WSP USA Group Insurance Plan’s motion to dismiss transgender plan member Andi Cox’s ERISA challenge to denial of facial gender-affirming surgery, holding her central claims survive while granting WSP’s motions to seal and to incorporate exhibits.
Fourth District holds the public-disclosure bar in California’s Insurance Frauds Prevention Act stops a qui tam plaintiff only when the suit is based on publicly disclosed allegations or transactions of fraud — not when it merely uses publicly available information.
Same-day companion to Amgen v. Sanofi/Regeneron, the UPC Court of Appeal in Meril v. Edwards held that the ‘same parties’ test under Art. 33(4) UPCA looks to identity of interests; that disclosed embodiments are generally covered by the patent claims unless the specification clearly teac
Case Telus Communications Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Videotron Ltd. and Rogers Communications Canada Inc. v. Federation of Canadian Municipalities, Bell