Case Fifth Avenue Entertainment LLC v Commodore Entertainment Corporation Court High Court, Chancery Division (United Kingdom) Judge Richard Paul Richards
Case ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Court Court of Justice of the European Union Date Decided 15
Case Attorney General of New South Wales v BF (a pseudonym) by his tutor Ashley Limbury Court Supreme Court of
Case Advanced Drainage Systems Inc v Microstrain Limited trading as CubicM3 Court High Court (Ireland) Judge Michael Twomey (Michael D.
The Massachusetts SJC held that likely trade-secret misappropriation does not create a presumption of irreparable harm supporting a preliminary injunction.
A Texas federal court granted in part a competitor’s motion for partial summary judgment, leaving for trial only a Lanham Act injunction claim over one allegedly false “all heme” statement and breach-of-settlement claims over iron supplement marketing.
Case Charles and Ivy Limited and Charles and Ivy Top Limited v Chelsea Supplies Ltd Court Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Case Damages Claim Case, Reiwa 6 (Ju) No. 2078 Court Supreme Court of Japan, Second Petty Bench (Japan) Date Decided
Case B&Q Limited v Wren Kitchens Limited Court High Court of Justice, Business and Property Division, Intellectual Property List (United
Case Société Thales v. Director General of the National Institute of Industrial Property Court Court of Cassation, Commercial, Financial and
Case M. [E] [Z] and PODG Développement SAS v. M. [B] [V] Court Court of Cassation, Commercial, Financial and Economic
The court applied the first-to-file rule and stayed the California case. Although Apple identified plausible prejudice concerns, it did not show that a short stay while the Texas court decided a fully briefed dismissal motion would cause additional concrete harm.
Case Mark Capital Management Limited v Ares Management LLC & Ors Court High Court of Justice, Business and Property Division,
The Northern District preserved narrowly pleaded skincare false-advertising claims but dismissed theories involving unspecified products and statements.
Case Choice Broadcasting Limited v Bauer Audio Ireland Limited Court High Court (Ireland) Judge in Jordan (Michael D. Higgins, 2019)
Case Aviator LLC & Ors v Spribe OÜ Court Court of Appeal (Civil Division) (United Kingdom) Judge Lord Justice Arnold
A Northern District court dismissed an artist’s AI-training DMCA claims because the complaint did not adequately allege intentional metadata removal or distribution of his works.
A Northern District court allowed DMCA anti-circumvention claims against ByteDance over alleged YouTube scraping to proceed past the pleading stage.
The Madras High Court held that India’s Trade Marks Registry must accept renewal of a mark that remains registered, despite an expired payment window and an online portal that blocked the filing.
A Northern District court allowed three tightly limited customer depositions in patent litigation while refusing a fourth request unsupported by a specific evidentiary need.
A Northern District of California court cancelled two emergency-shelter trade-dress registrations because the claimed configuration served practical functions.
A Magistrate Judge’s pretrial order in a patent infringement case bars a defendant from using prior art it failed to disclose in its invalidity contentions, rejecting the argument that the material was merely ‘background,’ while also excluding full expert reports as hearsay and ord
A federal judge ruled that a competitor’s earlier real-world sales of a similar kitchen utensil defeated a trademark owner’s infringement claim, showing that registration alone doesn’t guarantee priority rights.
A federal magistrate judge let Joby’s trade secret and contract claims against rival eVTOL maker Archer Aviation and a former employee partly proceed, while dismissing Archer’s counterclaims over Joby’s alleged China ties entirely under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine.