Fourth District holds that the COVID-19 pandemic and related government restrictions did not cause “damage” to the Brea Mall within the meaning of Revenue and Taxation Code section 170(a)(1), and that calamity reassessment requires actual physical damage to property.
First District affirms a $41,580 attorney’s fee award and imposes sanctions for a frivolous appeal where a self-represented litigant attempted to use a second appeal to attack the underlying anti-SLAPP ruling already affirmed in a prior appeal.
Fourth District reverses convictions in sexual assault case where the trial court failed to recognize that a peremptory challenge based on a juror’s nursing occupation was presumptively invalid under Code of Civil Procedure section 231.7, holding that defense counsel’s failure to specifi
First District holds that a Wells Fargo employee’s assurance that a fraudulent check had cleared states a cause of action for negligent misrepresentation, while affirming dismissal of breach of contract and other claims based on the deposit account agreement’s express disclaimers.
Fourth District holds that a court correcting a clerical error in an abstract of judgment is not required to conduct full resentencing or hear Romero motions, but exceeded its authority by modifying the underlying misdemeanor sentences during the correction process.
Fourth District affirms forcible rape and related convictions but holds that stayed sentences based on unused One Strike circumstances and the Habitual Sexual Offender law are unauthorized when the defendant is already sentenced under the One Strike law and Three Strikes law for the same offense.
Fourth District holds that impracticability of performance is an equitable defense that must be tried to the court rather than the jury and reverses a defense verdict in a breach of contract case arising from a Texas mortuary’s body mix-up that resulted in the wrong body being buried in San Di
Fifth District holds that CC&Rs adopted by a public hospital district cannot be enforced to prohibit a clinic from providing abortion services because such enforcement would violate the California Constitution’s reproductive freedom guarantee and Civil Code section 531.
Second District holds that a jury’s not-true findings on personal firearm use and a robbery special circumstance do not collaterally estop a resentencing court from finding the defendant was the actual killer in a Penal Code section 1172.6 hearing, applying People v. Santamaria and joining Peo
Second District holds that the family law court retains discretion under Family Code sections 2030 and 2032 to consider parties’ relative financial circumstances when fixing attorney’s fees, even where a marital settlement agreement contains a contractual prevailing party fee clause.