Fourth District reverses summary judgment for general contractor in $73 million emissions testing equipment dispute, holding that whether the equipment becomes a fixed part of the structure for purposes of the contractor licensing finished products exemption is a question of fact when supported by c
The Ninth Circuit stays a Portland district court injunction barring federal officers from using tear gas to disperse demonstrators outside an ICE facility, holding that nearby apartment residents likely have no substantive-due-process right to be free from incidental chemical exposure.
The Ninth Circuit stays a sweeping district court injunction that had restricted federal officers’ use of non-lethal crowd-control munitions and ordered ICE agent uniforms redesigned, holding the underlying First Amendment retaliation theory unlikely to succeed and the relief overbroad and imp
Third District affirms denial of anti-SLAPP motion to strike a cross-complaint challenging the validity of an air quality management district’s underlying interpretive policy, holding that the cross-complaint did not arise from the district’s protected enforcement activities.
First District holds that a probation condition allowing the probation department to incarcerate a defendant for up to 120 days without a court hearing improperly delegates judicial authority and that denying custody credit for residential treatment requires a knowing waiver under Penal Code section
Second District affirms denial of Blue Origin’s motion to compel arbitration of former employee’s FEHA sexual harassment and other claims, holding that the arbitration agreement is both substantively and procedurally unconscionable due to lack of mutuality and one-sided carve-outs, and t
Fourth District grants writ of mandate striking a $25,000 attorney’s fee condition the trial court had imposed sua sponte on the plaintiff’s leave to amend her complaint, holding that Code of Civil Procedure section 473 does not authorize fee awards as conditions of amendment.
The Ninth Circuit grants the United States an injunction pending appeal barring California from enforcing the No Vigilantes Act’s visible-identification requirement against federal officers, holding that the law likely violates the Supremacy Clause by directly regulating the federal government
Sitting en banc, the Ninth Circuit upholds the City of Oxnard’s voter-enacted per-candidate and aggregate campaign-contribution limits, holding the City sufficiently demonstrated an anti-corruption interest and that the limits are closely drawn to that interest under Randall v. Sorrell.
The Ninth Circuit holds that the IDEA’s two-year statute of limitations starts when parents know or should know that the school district has failed to assess their child and that the child’s education is inadequate, time-barring the family’s claims for special-education services re