The Nevada Supreme Court reaffirmed the pure stream-of-commerce test but held that one product reaching Nevada and unrelated CES attendance did not establish specific jurisdiction.
The Nevada Supreme Court adopted a historical-analog test for state civil jury rights and upheld an architecture board’s authority to impose licensing penalties without a jury.
The Nevada Supreme Court held that law-of-the-case principles—not jurisdiction—govern a successor judge’s authority to revisit an earlier ruling, and upheld removal of an unlawful plea drop-down.