Nikols v. Nikols — Personal trust and development rights ended at death
The Utah Court of Appeals held that a deceased beneficiary’s widow did not inherit his trust share, personal development agreement, or right of first refusal.
The Utah Court of Appeals held that a deceased beneficiary’s widow did not inherit his trust share, personal development agreement, or right of first refusal.
The Second Department held, in a case of first impression, that land wholly owned by a trust and an LLC is not heirs property under RPAPL 993.
The Court of Appeals affirmed the probate and circuit court orders with a modification to the fee award. The record supported rejection of the purported will, a finding that Hasian converted estate assets, and an award of litigation expenses under the Probate Code’s authority to allocate costs as justice and equity require. The court clarified the proper legal basis and scope of recoverable fees rather than treating every requested theory as interchangeable.
The Supreme Court accepted the agreement and publicly reprimanded Compton. It found violations of the professional rules governing competence, diligence, communication, and related responsibilities. The court also required payment of disciplinary costs, an assessment through Lawyers Helping Lawyers with compliance with resulting recommendations, and completion of Ethics School within one year.
The Alaska Supreme Court upheld a trust amendment that largely disinherited one son, deferring to findings of testamentary capacity and no undue influence.
The South Carolina Court of Appeals revived a constructive-trust theory based on an alleged promise not to use a testamentary power of appointment to alter a family company’s voting control.