Case Brad Ferrell v. Playfly, LLC Court Court of Appeals of Virginia Date Decided June 16, 2026 Docket No. 0674-25-2 […]
Case CORESITE, LLC, ET AL. v. COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA Court Court of Appeals of Virginia Date Decided June 16,
Case James Thomas Davis v. Commonwealth of Virginia Court Court of Appeals of Virginia Date Decided June 16, 2026 Docket
Case Logan Antigone, et al. v. Jay C. Taustin / Jay C. Taustin v. Logan Antigone, et al. Court Court
Case Logan Antigone, et al. v. Jay C. Taustin (consolidated with Jay C. Taustin v. Logan Antigone, et al.) Court
Case Refund Recovery Specialist, LLC v. City of Norfolk, Virginia, A Municipal Corporation by and through its Treasurer, Duan Hester
Case Commonwealth of Virginia v. Alsharrief Malik Mahoney Court Supreme Court of Virginia Date Decided June 11, 2026 Docket No.
Case Daniel C. Lavering v. University Village Owners Association Court Court of Appeals of Virginia Date Decided June 9, 2026
Case James David Hazelwood v. Commonwealth of Virginia Court Court of Appeals of Virginia Date Decided June 9, 2026 Docket
Case Mitchell Ira Young v. Commonwealth of Virginia Court Court of Appeals of Virginia Date Decided June 9, 2026 Docket
Case Bhagavan Kevin Antle v. Commonwealth of Virginia; Commonwealth of Virginia v. Bhagavan Kevin Antle Court Supreme Court of Virginia
Case Shalom Presbyterian Church of Washington, Inc., et al. v. Atlantic Korean American Presbytery Court Supreme Court of Virginia Date
Case Douglas Bell Wessel v. Virginia State Bar ex rel. Fifth District, Section II Committee Court Supreme Court of Virginia
The Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed a murder conviction obtained at retrial after a Brady violation, holding that dismissal of an indictment is available only where the violation causes irreparable prejudice or reflects a pattern of egregious prosecutorial misconduct—neither of which was present here where retrial gave the defense full opportunity to cross-examine the affected witness on the undisclosed agreement. The court also held that a Brady violation alone does not disqualify the prosecutor’s entire office.
The Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal of a challenge to a Roanoke rezoning, holding that planning commissions have implied Dillon Rule authority to continue a rezoning hearing from one regularly scheduled meeting to the next without fresh advertising—the original notice covers the continued session, a post-hearing statutory amendment to Code § 15.2-2204 does not apply retroactively, and non-substantive amendments to the application do not independently trigger re-advertising.