Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since May 26, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Real Property

Supreme Court of Guam
Uncategorized

In re Estate of Pangelinan — Supreme Court of Guam Holds Pro Se Executor Need Not Retain Counsel to Petition for Letters Testamentary

The Supreme Court of Guam unanimously reversed a probate court’s refusal to appoint a named executor, holding that neither a law license nor retained counsel is required to petition for letters testamentary under the Guam Probate Code, and that the statutory grounds of “improvidence” or “want of understanding” cannot be established solely by the petitioner’s failure to retain an attorney — even where the probate court acknowledged a severe attorney shortage on the island.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Uncategorized

Mt. Pleasant Investments v. Charleston County Assessor — ATI Exemption Caps Tax Value at Pre-Sale Baseline, Not Pre-Sale Plus Pre-ATI Improvements

The South Carolina Court of Appeals reversed the Administrative Law Court’s property tax ruling, holding that the “current fair market value” floor for the ATI exemption is the pre-sale value on the assessor’s books—not that value inflated by improvements the prior owner completed before the sale closed. Because the improvements were already incorporated into the ATI fair market value of $8,034,000 used to compute the exemption value, the Assessor’s approach of re-adding them to the current fair market value floor impermissibly double-counted them. The taxable value for tax year 2022 was $6,063,000, not $6,821,000.

Court of Appeals of Utah
Uncategorized

Johnson v. Moab City — Utah’s 1886 Townsite Plat Vested Title Before the 1890 Federal Patent, Defeating a Century-Long Adverse Possession Claim

The Utah Court of Appeals reversed a partial summary judgment that had quieted most of a disputed downtown Moab parcel to a private landowner, holding that the 1886 Moab Townsite Plat vested title in the municipality before the 1890 federal Luster Patent issued, that Utah’s rebuttable presumption of official regularity supplies the missing historical documentation, and that adverse possession cannot run against government land designated for public use regardless of how long the private use has continued.

Appellate Division, Second Department
Uncategorized

Del Vecchio v. Gangi — Fence Encroachment Is De Minimis and Cannot Support Adverse Possession Under NY’s 2008 RPAPL Amendments

The Appellate Division, Second Department modifies a Nassau County order to grant summary judgment dismissing an adverse possession counterclaim, holding that a metal fence erected in 2014 constitutes a de minimis non-structural encroachment deemed “permissive and non-adverse” under RPAPL 543(1), as amended in 2008 to curb bad-faith boundary-line squatting.

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Uncategorized

Alston v. Jacox — Prescriptive Easement Over Decades-Old Pathway Upheld Even After Third-Party Permission Grant

The North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed a prescriptive easement over a rural pathway that had been used for ingress and egress since the 1950s, holding that the required twenty-year period need not immediately precede the dispute and that an easement already vested by adverse use cannot be destroyed by a later permission grant to a third party.

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Uncategorized

Calaveras II, LLC v. Eastside Bend, LLC — Lis Pendens Misdescribing the Object of Suit Is Invalid; ORS 205.470 Damages Run Per Lot

The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed the striking of lis pendens notices as invalid encumbrances under ORS 205.460 because the notices falsely identified the object of the suit as enforcing a CC&R lien that did not exist, and held that the $5,000 minimum statutory penalty under ORS 205.470 applies on a per-lot basis when an invalid encumbrance clouds multiple individually titled parcels.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Uncategorized

Munnik v. Blue Harbor Resort — 29-Day Occupancy Restriction Upheld as Clear and Enforceable

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals upholds the 29-day continuous-occupancy restriction at Blue Harbor Resort in Sheboygan, holding that a clear condominium declaration restriction is enforceable even if buyers regret their investment, and that a governmental body’s vote to waive a restriction has no legal effect without a formal written amendment executed by all required parties.

Ohio Court of Appeals (Second District)
Uncategorized

Worch Lumber v. Fetzer — Second District holds Home Construction Service Suppliers Act does not apply to lumber supplier

The Second District affirmed that Ohio’s Home Construction Service Suppliers Act (HCSSA) did not apply to a lumber company’s transaction with a homeowner because the company was a material supplier, not a “home construction service supplier” as defined by the statute.

Ohio Court of Appeals (Ninth District)
Uncategorized

Johnson v. Smith — Ninth District reverses summary judgment, holds negligence per se claim for sidewalk defect survives despite open-and-obvious doctrine

The Ninth District reversed summary judgment for a property owner in a sidewalk fall case, holding that the open-and-obvious doctrine does not override negligence per se based on a municipal ordinance requiring sidewalk maintenance, and that the plaintiff’s statement about tripping was admissible as an excited utterance.

Ohio Court of Appeals (Third District)
Uncategorized

Treen v. Treen — Third District affirms eviction of son from father’s land, finds informal arrangement created month-to-month tenancy

The Third District affirmed a forcible entry and detainer judgment, holding that a father-son arrangement where the son occupied a mobile home on the father’s land rent-free but paid utilities and property taxes created a landlord-tenant relationship and a month-to-month tenancy under Ohio law.

Ohio Court of Appeals (Ninth District)
Uncategorized

Anthony v. Woolbright — Ninth District reverses in part, holds trial court improperly scheduled bench trial during jury demand

The Ninth District reversed in part a partition case, holding that the trial court erred in scheduling a bench trial when a valid jury demand had been filed, while affirming the denial of multiple continuance requests and the denial of leave to amend the complaint.

Ohio Court of Appeals (Ninth District)
Uncategorized

In re Haxton — Ninth District affirms removal of estate administrator, holds failure to object to magistrate’s decision forfeits appellate arguments

The Ninth District affirmed the removal of an ancillary estate administrator who had a conflict of interest, holding that his failure to file objections to the magistrate’s decision under Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(iv) forfeited all appellate arguments except plain error, which he did not argue.

Scroll to Top