Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided): –
Coverage since January 2, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Business Transactions

U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Uncategorized

Lipp v. Mixedbread AI — N.D. Cal. tosses conversion and Penal Code § 496 claims in AI co-founder dispute, lets contract claims survive

Magistrate Judge Hixson grants in part Mixedbread AI’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, dismissing AI startup co-founder Julius Lipp’s conversion and California Penal Code § 496 claims under the economic loss rule, while leaving the breach-of-contract counts intact.

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Mora Sandoval v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of GMC Yukon Lemon-Law Suit Where Documented Damages and Repair History Support Civil Penalties

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2021 GMC Yukon lemon-law case, holding GM had no duty to investigate beyond the complaint and the documented $78,776 in actual damages plus civil penalties (twice actual damages, supported by at least five repair attempts) brought the amount in c

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Lopez Lopez v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of Chevy Silverado Lemon-Law Suit Over $54K in Documented Damages Plus Civil Penalties

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2019 Chevy Silverado lemon-law case, holding documented actual damages of $54,232 plus civil penalties (twice actual damages, supported by at least ten repair attempts) brought the amount in controversy to roughly $162,698 — well over the $75,000

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Ascencio v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of Chevy Silverado Lemon-Law Suit Where Mileage Offset Eats Most of Purchase Price But Civil Penalties Push Past $75K

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2022 Chevy Silverado lemon-law suit where actual damages were modest ($34,932) after the mileage offset, but specific willfulness allegations and six repair attempts justified including civil penalties (twice actual damages), bringing the amount

U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
Uncategorized

Tan v. Quick Box — S.D. Cal. Magistrate Finds Konnektive Not Liable on Aiding-and-Abetting CLRA Claims After Bench Trial

After a bench trial in a consumer class action against an online skincare seller, the magistrate judge concluded that the seller’s customer-management software vendor was not liable on aiding-and-abetting or conspiracy theories under California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act because the p

U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
Uncategorized

Sierra Railroad v. Comcast Cable Communications — E.D. Cal. Dismisses Stale Contract Claims, Rejects Equitable Estoppel and Continuous Accrual

Eastern District of California dismisses Sierra Railroad’s contract and declaratory relief claims against Comcast as time-barred under California’s four-year statute of limitations, holding that promises to ‘try’ to resolve a dispute and a continuing failure to pay do not tol

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Barrera Farret v. Ford Motor Co. — C.D. Cal. Remands Lemon-Law Suit, Rejecting Fraudulent-Joinder Attack on Dealership

Judge Stephen V. Wilson remanded a Ford lemon-law case back to state court, joining the consensus of California district courts that the economic loss rule and the California Supreme Court’s Rattagan v. Uber decision do not categorically bar negligent-repair claims against dealerships.

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Lewis v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Remands Lemon-Law Suit Where Defendant Cannot Show $50K Amount in Controversy Under Magnuson-Moss Act

Judge Stephen V. Wilson remanded a Chevrolet Colorado lemon-law case, holding GM could not show even the $50,000 Magnuson-Moss amount-in-controversy threshold because actual damages were measured by payments actually made ($37,410.95), the conclusory willfulness allegation did not support adding civ

U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Uncategorized

In re PG&E Corporation — N.D. Cal. denies interlocutory appeal of bankruptcy ruling that PSLRA discovery stay does not apply

Judge Gilliam declines interlocutory review of a Bankruptcy Court ruling that the PSLRA’s automatic discovery stay does not shield non-party Directors and Underwriters from third-party subpoenas served by claimants in the PG&E bankruptcy, even though the Directors and Underwriters are also defe

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Sanchez v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Remands Lemon-Law Suit on Volt Lease Where Mileage Offset Reduces Damages Below MMWA Threshold

Judge Stephen V. Wilson remanded a Chevrolet Volt lemon-law case after applying the Song-Beverly mileage offset (86,841 miles before first repair) to reduce damages from $42,682 to $11,794, leaving the case below both the $50,000 MMWA and $75,000 diversity thresholds.

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Hoffman v. Goli Nutrition — C.D. Cal. Grants Summary Judgment to VMG Investors on Trade Secret Claim Where Vitamin Friends Lacked Ownership

Judge Christina Snyder granted summary judgment for VMG Partners and other investors on a Defend Trade Secrets Act claim because plaintiff Vitamin Friends LLC could not show it owned the supplier trade secrets — its affiliate Better Nutritionals did. Repeat fraud, RICO, and breach-of-fiduciary-duty

Scroll to Top