After the defendant’s counsel ultimately confirmed that the company had received the complaint on August 1, 2025, the court ruled the September 25, 2025 notice of removal was filed weeks past the 30-day deadline and remanded the case to state court, declining to award sanctions because there w
After defendants ignored a court order to pay an $11,400 attorney-fee award, the magistrate judge certified facts to the district judge supporting civil contempt and recommended a coercive per-diem fine, but recommended denying the plaintiff’s request for additional fees on the contempt motion
After defendants in a private-jet brokerage dispute substantially failed to comply with a court order requiring document production and on-site electronic-storage inspection, the magistrate judge recommended civil contempt and coercive per-diem fines, but declined to recommend the harsher remedies o
Second District holds a personal-injury plaintiff’s pretrial settlement offer conditioned on the defendant’s insurer’s consent was a valid Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offer, because insurer consent is a necessary condition of any insured-defendant settlement whether stated
Third District dismisses plaintiffs’ third appeal in an assisted-living negligence case, holding a postjudgment costs order entered after a voluntary dismissal without prejudice does not provide a back-door route to appellate review of an underlying summary-adjudication ruling.
The court dismissed without prejudice an immigration habeas petition that had been signed by the detainee’s long-term partner as ‘next friend,’ ruling that even if the partner had a basis for next-friend standing under Whitmore v. Arkansas, she could not represent the detainee whil
Central District of California remands a pro se eye-injury suit against Amazon, holding that even allegations of permanent blindness — without quantification of damages — cannot satisfy the $75,000 amount-in-controversy requirement, and denies the plaintiff’s motion for sanctions.
First District reverses a trial-court order that bound a wife to the date of separation alleged in her amended dissolution petition, holding that allegation was not a judicial admission where the parties had treated a different date as in dispute throughout the litigation.
After granting the plaintiff’s request to proceed without paying the filing fee, the court dismissed her five-sentence complaint alleging RICO and due-process violations against a single defendant for failure to state a plausible claim and noted serious doubts about whether venue was proper in
Central District of California denies remand of a wrongful-termination suit by a former Walmart warehouse worker who took medical leave for cancer treatment, holding that lost wages alone — calculated as 2.5 years of back pay plus 2.5 years of front pay — exceed the federal $75,000 amount-in-controv