Civil Procedure Cases
Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Clear all
Coverage since February 25, 2025
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Civil Procedure

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Busch v. County of Erie — Federal Hepatitis A Findings Bar State Jail Conditions Claim Via Collateral Estoppel

The Fourth Department bars a state premises-liability claim arising from hepatitis A contraction in Erie County jail under collateral estoppel, based on the federal court’s explicit finding that the plaintiff produced no evidence of unsanitary conditions, and dismisses punitive damages against the municipality.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Broadway Warehouse v. Buffalo Barn — Fourth Department Rejects “Fees on Fees” Under Commercial Lease

The Fourth Department held that a standard commercial lease attorney’s fees clause does not authorize “fees on fees” — recovery of fees incurred to collect a prior attorney’s fee award — absent unmistakably clear contractual language, and further held that failure to object to a referee’s denial of CPLR 5001 prejudgment interest waives that argument on appeal.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Shattuck v. Dryden Mutual — Wrongful Disclaimer Is Anticipatory Repudiation, Bad Faith Claims Reinstated

The Fourth Department held that Dryden Mutual’s wrongful coverage disclaimer was an anticipatory repudiation excusing the insured from forwarding suit papers, barring the insurer from challenging the $2.8 million default judgment in a § 3420 direct action, and requiring reinstatement of bad faith claims under the Pavia “gross disregard” standard.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Hurst v. State of New York — Snow Tubing Claim Dismissed Under Primary Assumption of Risk

The Fourth Department affirmed dismissal of a snow tubing personal injury claim against the State, holding that hitting a snow pile at the base of a hill was a foreseeable consequence of recreational sledding encompassed by the primary assumption of risk doctrine, and that the open and obvious snow piles did not unreasonably enhance that risk.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Syracuse University v. City of Syracuse — Court Reverses Sua Sponte Dismissal, Grants RPTL 420-a Exemption

The Fourth Department reversed the sua sponte dismissal of Syracuse University’s tax-assessment challenge, holding that RPTL 525(2)(a) is not jurisdictional and cannot be invoked after a municipality expressly waives it, and granted the University a full RPTL 420-a educational-use exemption on summary judgment.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Village of Allegany v. City of Olean — All Counterclaims Dismissed for Notice-of-Claim Deficiency

The Fourth Department dismissed all of the City of Olean’s counterclaims against the Village of Allegany, holding that CPLR 9802’s notice-of-claim requirements apply to counterclaims and declaratory-relief theories, and that a notice limited to breach of contract cannot sustain claims premised on contract expiration, quantum meruit, or unjust enrichment.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Cindy W. v. Waterloo School District — Late Notice of Claim Granted Where School Had Actual Knowledge of Bullying

The Fourth Department reversed the denial of a late-notice-of-claim application in a school bullying case, finding that the District acquired actual knowledge of the claim through its counselor’s involvement in related Family Court proceedings and that the mother’s preoccupation with those proceedings constituted a reasonable excuse for the delay.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Deming v. County of Chautauqua — Successor-Liability Claims Against Casella Waste Survive Dismissal

The Fourth Department affirmed denial of Casella Waste Management’s motion to dismiss third-party claims arising from a fatal bulldozer accident, holding that the asset purchase agreement did not conclusively negate the Schumacher “mere continuation” and “merger” exceptions to successor corporate liability.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Matter of Carville v. Clark — DA’s Article 78 Challenge to CPL 160.50 Unsealing Order Dismissed

The Fourth Department dismissed a district attorney’s Article 78 petition seeking to overturn a court order barring re-presentment to a grand jury and denying unsealing under CPL 160.50(1), holding that unsealing applications are civil in nature and cannot be challenged via Article 78.

Scroll to Top