The Sixth District affirmed the appointment of a receiver over data center companies where the principals acknowledged inability to pay debts and provided no documentary evidence of future solvency.
The Sixth District dismissed an appeal after finding the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on summary judgment motions while a prior appeal involving related parties was pending.
The Sixth District affirmed the trial court’s decision to exclude a minor child from a domestic violence protection order where a custody and visitation order already existed in juvenile court and limited evidence connected the child to the domestic violence.
The Sixth District affirmed a speeding conviction where the pro se defendant failed to serve formal discovery on the prosecutor, holding that public records requests to the sheriff’s office do not satisfy Crim.R. 16 discovery obligations, even when a judge ordered the State to comply.
The Sixth District affirmed the vacatur of a Tennessee default judgment enforced in Ohio, finding the Tennessee court lacked personal jurisdiction over the Ohio car dealer, and upheld sanctions against the pro se plaintiff for submitting AI-generated hallucinated case citations to the court.