The Ninth Circuit denies en banc rehearing in a Nevada death-penalty habeas case, leaving in place a panel decision allowing the petitioner to invoke Martinez v. Ryan to revive long-defaulted trial-ineffective-assistance claims, over a forceful dissent from nine judges.
The Ninth Circuit affirms the denial of a Mexican spouse’s visa application, holding that after Department of State v. Muñoz a U.S. citizen spouse can still invoke the Mandel exception based on her First Amendment right to receive information, but that the consular officer’s reason-to-be
The Ninth Circuit reverses a federal habeas grant in a California death-penalty case, holding that under AEDPA’s doubly deferential standard the California Supreme Court reasonably rejected the petitioner’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims, including those based on cumulative pre
The Ninth Circuit holds that the NVRA’s public inspection provision requires states to disclose records about their voter list maintenance activities but not the underlying statewide voter rolls themselves, affirming dismissal of an election-integrity nonprofit’s NVRA suit against Hawaii
The Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of Rohingya plaintiffs’ claims that Facebook’s design enabled the spread of anti-Rohingya content in Myanmar, holding that Section 230 immunity bars the suit, with three judges concurring to urge en banc reconsideration of the court’s Section 230
The Ninth Circuit grants a stay pending appeal of an Arizona district court injunction that had struck the word ‘operation’ from the state’s birth-certificate-amendment statute, leaving Arizona’s surgical-verification requirement in place while the merits appeal proceeds.
The Ninth Circuit affirms denial of an I-130 spousal petition under the marriage fraud bar, holding that the bar applies to attempts to enter sham marriages even without follow-on benefits applications and that USCIS need not produce the ex-spouse for cross-examination.
The Ninth Circuit stays a Portland district court injunction barring federal officers from using tear gas to disperse demonstrators outside an ICE facility, holding that nearby apartment residents likely have no substantive-due-process right to be free from incidental chemical exposure.
The Ninth Circuit stays a sweeping district court injunction that had restricted federal officers’ use of non-lethal crowd-control munitions and ordered ICE agent uniforms redesigned, holding the underlying First Amendment retaliation theory unlikely to succeed and the relief overbroad and imp
The Ninth Circuit grants the United States an injunction pending appeal barring California from enforcing the No Vigilantes Act’s visible-identification requirement against federal officers, holding that the law likely violates the Supremacy Clause by directly regulating the federal government
Sitting en banc, the Ninth Circuit upholds the City of Oxnard’s voter-enacted per-candidate and aggregate campaign-contribution limits, holding the City sufficiently demonstrated an anti-corruption interest and that the limits are closely drawn to that interest under Randall v. Sorrell.
The Ninth Circuit holds that the IDEA’s two-year statute of limitations starts when parents know or should know that the school district has failed to assess their child and that the child’s education is inadequate, time-barring the family’s claims for special-education services re
The Ninth Circuit vacates an insider-trading conviction because the trial court failed to investigate a juror who said he was unsure of being impartial, instead asking the juror to monitor his own bias, in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury.
The Ninth Circuit denies panel rehearing and rehearing en banc in the tribes’ challenge to a BLM land exchange under FLPMA, leaving in place the panel’s ruling that an 1900 cession statute restricts disposal of certain Fort Hall ceded lands.
The Ninth Circuit holds that a federal contractor’s revocation of a Security Police Officer’s Part 1046 fitness-for-duty certification is reviewable under the ADA and is not the kind of national-security clearance decision insulated from review under Department of Navy v. Egan.
The Ninth Circuit holds that a California rape conviction under Penal Code section 261(a)(2) is a categorical match for the federal generic definition of rape, qualifying as an aggravated felony and defeating an illegal-reentry defendant’s collateral attack on his prior removal order.