Contract Interpretation Cases
Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided): –
Coverage since April 30, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Contract Interpretation

Appellate Division, First Department
Uncategorized

Newmark Partners, L.P. v. Singer — First Dept. Affirms $3M CPLR 3213 Judgment Where Settlement Agreement Self-Identified as Instrument for Payment of Money Only

The First Department affirmed a $3 million summary judgment in lieu of complaint, holding that a Rescission and Settlement Agreement that defendants contractually designated as “an Agreement for the payment of money only” qualified for CPLR 3213 treatment and that a Delaware non-reliance clause barred defendants’ fraudulent inducement defense.

Appellate Division, First Department
Uncategorized

Leinhardt v. Socure — Fraud Claims Barred by Release; Sophisticated Plaintiff Cannot Invoke Peculiar-Knowledge Exception

The Appellate Division, First Department, reverses and dismisses fraud claims by a former Socure shareholder, holding that broad releases he signed — as a sophisticated attorney who knowingly proceeded without full information — bar the claims as a matter of law and defeat reasonable reliance; defendants awarded attorneys’ fees.

Appellate Division, First Department
Uncategorized

Napolitano v. Bounce 21 — ABC Law § 126 Violation Does Not Void Consulting Agreement Under Illegality Doctrine

First Department reinstates a consultant’s claims against a sports bar, holding that ABC Law § 126(1) — a malum prohibitum regulation — does not automatically void a profit-sharing consulting agreement under New York’s illegality doctrine absent evidence the contract required an illegal act to be performed.

Appellate Division, First Department
Uncategorized

501 Fifth Avenue Co. v. Frawley — Asset Purchase Agreement Did Not Transfer Real Property Lease, Buyer Not Liable for Rent

First Department affirms summary judgment for business buyers, holding that an asset purchase agreement covering ‘leases of personal property and equipment’ did not assume the former tenant’s commercial real estate lease, which required an express assumption under New York contract interpretation principles.

Massachusetts Appeals Court
Uncategorized

New England Carpenters v. Arch Insurance — Fringe-Benefit Fund Trustees Are Intended Third-Party Beneficiaries Exempt from G.L. c. 149, § 29 Notice Requirement

The Massachusetts Appeals Court vacated summary judgment for the surety, holding that fringe-benefit fund trustees who are intended third-party beneficiaries of a collective bargaining agreement have a “contractual relationship” with the general contractor under G.L. c. 149, § 29, exempting them from the statute’s sixty-five-day written notice requirement.

California Court of Appeal, First District, Division One
Uncategorized

McConnell v. Jahnke — Court of Appeal Holds Spouse Assuming Mortgage Need Not Remove Ex from the Loan

The California Court of Appeal, First District, holds that a marital settlement provision awarding one spouse the home ‘and all debts thereon’ does not include an implied obligation to remove the other spouse from the mortgage — practitioners must draft that term explicitly.

Texas Court of Appeals, Thirteenth District (Corpus Christi–Edinburg)
Uncategorized

In Re Germania Farm Mutual — Texas Appeals Court Compels Insurance Appraisal Despite Insurer’s Full Claim Denial

The Thirteenth Court of Appeals conditionally granted mandamus compelling appraisal in a homeowner’s insurance dispute, holding that Germania’s outright claim denial did not preclude appraisal and that the policyholder failed to establish waiver or prejudice from any delay in demanding the process.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

University Hill Realty v. Akl — Broker Commission Claim Revived Based on Post-Expiration Text Messages

The Fourth Department reversed summary judgment for property-owner defendants and reinstated a real estate broker’s commission claim, finding that post-expiration text messages discussing incoming offers created a triable issue whether the parties formed an implied-in-fact contract for brokerage services.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Uncategorized

Munnik v. Blue Harbor Resort — 29-Day Occupancy Restriction Upheld as Clear and Enforceable

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals upholds the 29-day continuous-occupancy restriction at Blue Harbor Resort in Sheboygan, holding that a clear condominium declaration restriction is enforceable even if buyers regret their investment, and that a governmental body’s vote to waive a restriction has no legal effect without a formal written amendment executed by all required parties.

Uncategorized

Blackmon Mooring v. St. Edward’s University — Third Court Reverses Summary Judgment, Holds Parol Evidence Cannot Transform Cost Estimate into Price Cap

The Third Court of Appeals reversed summary judgment for St. Edward’s University, holding that the parol evidence rule prohibited using pre-contract negotiations to transform a cost-plus contract’s ‘estimated budgetary price’ into a guaranteed maximum price.

Superior Court of Delaware, Complex Commercial Litigation Division (CCLD)
Uncategorized

SRS v. Follett Parent — Court Sustains Most Breach-of-Contract Claims Over Post-Merger Lumen Sale Dispute

Delaware CCLD denies most of a buyer’s motion to dismiss post-merger breach-of-contract claims, finding the buyer plausibly failed to use reasonable best efforts to sell an asset and improperly refused to retain a contractually required valuation firm.

Scroll to Top