Case Cody Wayne Coleman v. Commonwealth of Virginia Court Court of Appeals of Virginia Judge CLIFFORD L. ATHEY, JR. (elected […]
First District holds that a juvenile court may consider a victim impact statement at a six-month baseline review hearing if it limits its consideration to material relevant to the juvenile’s rehabilitation.
Case B.S., et al. v. Carlos Lopez-Rangel Court North Dakota Supreme Court Judge Fair McEvers (Jack Dalrymple, 2014) Date Decided
Case Alexis Harriman v. Dillon Lamothe et al. Court Maine Supreme Judicial Court Judge Connors (Janet Mills, 2020) Date Decided
Fourth District holds that a voluntary declaration of parentage is void where the birth mother had attempted to marry another man in apparent compliance with the law, making him a presumed parent under Family Code section 7611(b).
Case Elizabeth Miller v. Mark Miller Court Idaho Supreme Court Judge BEVAN (C.L. “Butch” Otter, 2017) Date Decided March 24,
First District extends its warning about AI-generated fake citations to self-represented litigants and reverses a child support order for failing to include the obligor’s bonus and restricted stock unit income.
First District holds that a default dissolution judgment must be vacated under Code of Civil Procedure section 580 when the petition listed assets only as ‘to be determined’ and the responding spouse lacked notice of the actual property division being sought.
First District reverses a juvenile court order transferring a 16-year-old murder defendant to adult court because the court did not apply the heightened amenability standards required by AB 2361 and SB 545.
Case State of North Dakota v. Jodi L. Cooper Court North Dakota Supreme Court Judge Fair McEvers (Jack Dalrymple, 2014)
Fourth District reverses Family Code section 271 sanctions for refusing to convert legal separation into dissolution and reverses a mutual DVRO that lacked substantial evidence of the wife as primary aggressor.
First District affirms juvenile court jurisdiction but reverses removal of an infant from a mother with serious mental illness because the agency did not show reasonable efforts to prevent removal.
Fourth District affirms a pet custody order but imposes $5,000 in sanctions on counsel for repeatedly citing AI-generated fake cases and reports the conduct to the State Bar of California.
Case In the Interest of B.P., Child; State of North Dakota v. B.P., Child; C.P., Father; Sharla Price, Guardian ad
Case Roxane M. Marschner v. Richard A. Marschner Court Supreme Court of North Dakota Judge Jerod E. Tufte (elected 2016)
Case Sarah E. Bedgar v. Jeremy R. Wilson and State of North Dakota Court Supreme Court of North Dakota Judge
Case Sandra Rae Kantola v. Robert Douglas Kantola Court Supreme Court of North Dakota Judge Lisa Fair McEvers (Jack Dalrymple,
Case Lukas Kostelecky v. Charity Erickson, et al. Court Supreme Court of North Dakota Judge Bahr (Doug Burgum, 2023) Date
Case Nicholas Jon Emme v. Christal Rose Emme, et al. Court Supreme Court of North Dakota Judge Lisa Fair McEvers
Fourth District reverses a five-year DVRO for the second time, holding the trial court again denied the incarcerated respondent meaningful access to the courts by issuing the order without addressing his request to appear telephonically.
Fourth District affirms a juvenile court’s joint-and-several restitution order, holding the January 2025 amendment to Welfare and Institutions Code section 730.6 — which replaced joint-and-several liability with several liability based on percentage of fault — does not apply retroactively to a
Second District holds that a juvenile court ordering monitored visitation by a paid professional must first consider the parent’s ability to pay and the availability of reasonable alternatives, where the parent has timely raised an inability-to-pay objection.
Second District holds that California’s prohibition on parental contractual waiver of child-support arrearages applies even after the children have reached the age of majority and there is no current support order in place.
First District reverses a trial-court order that bound a wife to the date of separation alleged in her amended dissolution petition, holding that allegation was not a judicial admission where the parties had treated a different date as in dispute throughout the litigation.