Case Sam Morris v. Todd W. Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Case United States v. Montez Hall Court United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Judge BOGGS (Ronald Reagan,
Case Jenna Amacher v. City of Tullahoma, Tennessee; Jennifer Moody; Ray Knowis; Scott Van Velsor; Jim Woodard Court U.S. Court
Case United States of America v. Montez Hall Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Date Decided June
Case Sam Morris v. Todd W. Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Case United States of America v. Jocelyn Benson, in her official capacity as Secretary of the State of Michigan; State
Case United States of America v. Seth D. Hoover Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Judge GIBBONS
Case Bismark Boa-Bonsu v. Deborah Owusu Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Judge MOORE (Bill Clinton, 1995);
Case NetChoice, LLC v. David Yost, in his official capacity as Ohio Attorney General Court U.S. Court of Appeals for
Case Rubicon Real Estate Holdings, LLC; Browne Design Consultants, LLC; Joseph Brown v. City of Pontiac, Michigan; Garland S. Doyle
The Sixth Circuit affirmed denial of a preliminary injunction against P&G’s Spruce weed killer, holding that Scotts failed to prove its Miracle-Gro green-and-yellow trade dress was distinctive enough to support a likelihood of confusion.
The Sixth Circuit reversed summary judgment for George Clinton and his company Thang, holding that genuine disputes of material fact exist about whether the late P-Funk keyboardist Bernie Worrell was a co-author and co-owner of the group’s sound recordings under copyright law.
The Sixth Circuit holds that district courts may not require ‘clear and convincing evidence’ for each preliminary injunction factor in trade secret cases, reversing a lower court’s denial of injunctive relief against an engineer who allegedly took proprietary documents to a competitor.
In a 2-1 decision, the Sixth Circuit affirmed only $1 in nominal damages for Sanyo’s admitted misuse of Oldnar’s touchscreen know-how under a joint development agreement, holding that the plaintiff’s sole royalty-based damages theory was legally inapplicable.
The Sixth Circuit held that Static Control Components had standing to sue Lexmark under the Lanham Act for false advertising in the toner cartridge market — a ruling affirmed by the Supreme Court in 2014 under a new zone-of-interests and proximate cause standing framework that displaced the split am