Case Isaac “Ike” Perlmutter, et al. v. Federal Insurance Company, et al. Court Supreme Court of Florida Judge Muñiz (Ron […]
Case Homesite Insurance Company of Florida v. Zurich American Insurance Company and J.F. Allen Company, Inc.; and Zurich American Insurance
Case Tristan Smith v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company Court Mississippi Supreme Court Judge GRIFFIS (Phil Bryant, 2019) Date
Case Pawel Szwed v Aviva Insurance Ltd Court High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division (United Kingdom) Judge Hill (Queen
Case Sidi Klein v. Eli Sa’adon, Rita Klein, Henry Klein, and Municipality of Rehovot Court Supreme Court of Israel (Civil
Case Christina Elmers v. George Slocum Court Iowa Court of Appeals Judge Ahlers (Kim Reynolds, 2019) Date Decided June 10,
Case Iowa 80 Truckstop, Inc., I-80 Investments Co., Inc., and Iowa 80 Group, Inc. v. Scott County Board of Review
Case State of Oregon v. O. A. M. A. Court Oregon Court of Appeals Date Decided June 10, 2026 Docket
The Massachusetts Appeals Court vacated summary judgment for the surety, holding that fringe-benefit fund trustees who are intended third-party beneficiaries of a collective bargaining agreement have a “contractual relationship” with the general contractor under G.L. c. 149, § 29, exempting them from the statute’s sixty-five-day written notice requirement.
Case Andrea Dale Dye v. Farmers & Mechanics Mutual Insurance Company of West Virginia Court Supreme Court of Appeals of
Case Dr. Michèle Le Blanc, Individually v. 615 Condominium, Inc., et al. Court Florida First District Court of Appeal Judge
Case Jonckeau v. British Columbia (Attorney General) Court Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Canada) Judge Honourable Justice Brundrett (General
The First Department held that ‘funds’ in a liability policy exclusion includes student tuition, but affirmed the insurer’s duty to defend because student class actions seek compensatory and other damages beyond a simple tuition refund.
Case Shomera Insurance Company Ltd. v. Menachem Mendel Lichtstein Court Supreme Court of Israel (sitting as Court of Civil Appeals)
The Indiana Court of Appeals holds that claims against an opioid treatment program for failing to warn a patient about driving risks while on methadone fall under Indiana’s Medical Malpractice Act, even when the injured party is a third-party motorist.
The Sixth DCA reversed summary judgment in favor of a maintenance contractor on Walgreen’s contractual indemnity crossclaim, finding genuine issues of material fact regarding whether the contractor’s negligence triggered the indemnity provision.
The Thirteenth Court of Appeals conditionally granted mandamus compelling appraisal in a homeowner’s insurance dispute, holding that Germania’s outright claim denial did not preclude appraisal and that the policyholder failed to establish waiver or prejudice from any delay in demanding the process.
The Fourth Department held that Dryden Mutual’s wrongful coverage disclaimer was an anticipatory repudiation excusing the insured from forwarding suit papers, barring the insurer from challenging the $2.8 million default judgment in a § 3420 direct action, and requiring reinstatement of bad faith claims under the Pavia “gross disregard” standard.
The Ninth Circuit reverses an ERISA denial of a disc replacement surgery, holding that Cigna abused its discretion by relying on its own internal policy rather than the governing plan document, and that the district court improperly affirmed using rationales never raised during the administrative pr
Case State of North Dakota, by and through Workforce Safety and Insurance v. Russell C. Jones and Top Shelf Energy,
Case Tiki’s Grill & Bar, LLC v. DTRIC Insurance Company, Limited Court Supreme Court of Hawai’i Judge Vladimir P. Devens
Case In Re Creation of Rule 412 of the Arkansas Rules of Evidence Court Supreme Court of Arkansas Judge Per
The Texas Fifteenth Court of Appeals affirmed a district court ruling that the PUC’s mid-proceeding modification of its rate filing package without Texas Register publication was arbitrary and capricious, requiring application of the pre-amendment 0.25x debt service coverage adder presumption, while upholding the Commission’s exclusion of a municipal utility’s general fund transfer return-on-investment component as insufficiently substantiated.
The Third Department addresses claims against an insurance agency for failing to procure adequate coverage, analyzing breach of contract and negligence theories of liability.