Second Department affirms denial of property owners’ motion to dismiss Labor Law § 240(1) and § 241(6) claims arising from worker’s elevation-related injury during renovation — Scaffold Law claims survive CPLR 3211 and must be addressed through discovery.
The Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed denial of a CPLR 3211 motion to dismiss, holding that a pre-litigation covenant not to sue did not “clearly and unequivocally” release the defendant from its own negligence and therefore could not bar the plaintiff’s Labor Law §§ 200, 240(1), and 241(6) claims.
New York’s Appellate Division, Second Department reversed summary judgment for a limousine company, holding that the Labor Law “taxicab exception” does not apply to Labor Law Article 6 wage claims, and that black car drivers operating under corporate service contracts may not fall within the Article 19 exception either.
The Appellate Division, Second Department affirms denial of summary judgment on a Labor Law § 240(1) Scaffold Law claim where conflicting testimony created a triable issue of fact as to whether a worker was struck by a suspended load moving under the force of gravity when a backhoe’s tire entered a depression in the roadway.