Charisme v. Chestnut — prior release requires hearing before ICE can detain again
prior release requires hearing before ICE can detain again.
Uncategorized
Litigation
Uncategorized
Marsh v. Freedom Mortgage — mortgage complaint dismissed but homeowners may amend
A federal court rejected dismissal as a procedural sanction but found that pro se homeowners had not pleaded a viable federal mortgage claim.
Uncategorized
Marsh v. Freedom Mortgage — mortgage complaint dismissed but homeowners may amend
A federal court rejected dismissal as a procedural sanction but found that pro se homeowners had not pleaded a viable federal mortgage claim.
Uncategorized
Celvin Antonio Q.C. v. Andrews — years of community ties create protected liberty interest
years of community ties create protected liberty interest.
Uncategorized
Caballero Luna v. Warden — twelve months of mandatory detention triggers bond hearing
twelve months of mandatory detention triggers bond hearing.
Uncategorized
Caballero Luna v. Warden — twelve months of mandatory detention triggers bond hearing
twelve months of mandatory detention triggers bond hearing.
Uncategorized
Jagmeet S. v. Warden — conditional release creates liberty interest despite pending charges
conditional release creates liberty interest despite pending charges.
Uncategorized
Jagmeet S. v. Warden — conditional release creates liberty interest despite pending charges
conditional release creates liberty interest despite pending charges.
Uncategorized
Industrial Bank v. Yuan — California hotel assets support arbitration jurisdiction
A California federal court lacked personal jurisdiction over a Chinese respondent but could proceed against three specifically identified California hotels to address arbitral awards.
Uncategorized
Industrial Bank v. Yuan — California hotel assets support arbitration jurisdiction
A California federal court lacked personal jurisdiction over a Chinese respondent but could proceed against three specifically identified California hotels to address arbitral awards.
Uncategorized
Daniel Rodriguez Quintero v. Tristan Lemon — Prisoner Claims Narrowed at Screening
The magistrate judge recommended dismissing claims and defendants that lacked facts showing personal participation, a constitutional deprivation, or a permissible connection to the surviving dispute.
Uncategorized
Jimmie Earl Jones III v. Cyprian Puisis — Federal Claims Failed at the Pleading Stage
The magistrate judge recommended dismissal with prejudice.
Uncategorized
Matthew Del Real v. Fay Servicing — Sparse Record Could Not Stop Foreclosure
The district court denied the temporary restraining order because the complaint and motion did not supply enough dates, correspondence, evidence, or legal analysis to show a likelihood of success.
Uncategorized
Apple v. Piney Woods Mobility — Later-Filed Patent Declaratory Action Stayed Under First-to-File Rule
The court applied the first-to-file rule and stayed the California case. Although Apple identified plausible prejudice concerns, it did not show that a short stay while the Texas court decided a fully briefed dismissal motion would cause additional concrete harm.
Uncategorized
Eden Environmental v. PBF Energy — Refinery Citizen-Suit Claims Largely Survive Motion to Dismiss
The court rejected the broad attacks on standing, notice, and the theory that Clean Water Act and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act claims necessarily became Clean Air Act claims. Several core statutory and state-law theories survived.
Uncategorized
Diversified Restaurant Group v. Houston Casualty — Demand Letter Was a Claim Under Claims-Made Policy
The court held that the letter was a claim and granted summary judgment to Houston Casualty. Its substance communicated a demand tied to damages for which the insurer might be responsible, triggering the policy’s reporting requirement.
Uncategorized
Turrey v. Vervent — Court Awards $535,000 for Successful Appellate Work in Student-Loan Class Case
The court awarded $535,000. The lodestar was approximately $451,270, and the roughly 19 percent increase reasonably compensated counsel for delayed payment because the calculation used older 2023 rates even though much of the appellate work occurred after rates increased.
Uncategorized
Soro v. FCA US — Late-Filed Song-Beverly Warranty Claims Fail at Summary Judgment
A federal court held that a Ram lessee’s Song-Beverly express-warranty claims were filed too late because she knew of recurring defects years before suing.
Uncategorized
People v. U.S. Fire Insurance — Surety Remains Liable After Failure to Arrange Required GPS
People v. U.S. Fire Insurance: Surety Remains Liable After Failure to Arrange Required GPS.
Uncategorized
Chavez v. TopHat Media — Amended Complaint Eliminating Punitive Damages Required Remand
A California federal court remanded a removed case after an amended complaint dropped punitive damages and left less than the jurisdictional amount in controversy.
Uncategorized
Ortiz v. Foris Dax — Anonymous Crypto Browsing Data Does Not Establish Federal Standing
Crypto.com users lacked federal standing because anonymous browsing and device data did not disclose their own sensitive financial information.
Uncategorized
Thieriot v. Franchise Tax Board — Federal Court Cannot Halt California Tax Collection
A taxpayer could not use federal court to halt California tax collection because the state refund process provides an adequate remedy.
Uncategorized
Doe v. County of Lake — Juvenile Hall Abuse Survivors May Pursue Institutional Claims
Juvenile hall abuse survivors plausibly alleged that a concealed county custom delayed accrual of their institutional civil-rights claims.
Uncategorized
Carter-Griffin v. Oakland — Notice, Shelter, and Storage Defeat Emergency Property-Seizure Request
An unhoused Oakland resident was denied emergency relief because the city gave notice and offered shelter and temporary property storage.