San Diego could not relitigate pleading-stage rulings that allowed Safe Sleeping residents’ housing, disability, and danger claims to proceed.
The court granted habeas relief and ordered Dos Santos released immediately on the same conditions that applied before his detention.
The Southern District denied the petition.
The Southern District denied habeas relief.
The Southern District held that Rule 41(a)(1) made the dismissal effective without a court order because the defendant had not served an answer or summary-judgment motion.
Doe v. Wells Fargo: Employer Strict Liability Requires the Harasser to Supervise the Victim.
Chin v. DoorDash: Employee Waived EFAA Protection by Withholding Known Harassment Claim.
United States v. So: Foreign-Evidence Tolling Covered Bribery Conspiracy Charge.
A California federal court dismissed claims over an international watch-parts shipment because federal air-carriage law preempted the claims and the Carmack Amendment did not apply.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered immediate release.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered immediate release.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered denial of emergency release.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered a prompt substantive bond hearing.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered habeas relief and release unless lawful custody resumes after a final removal order.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered a bond hearing within seven days.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered a bond hearing or release.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered a bond hearing within seven days or release.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered immediate release.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered habeas relief and immediate release.
The Eastern District limited pre-certification employment discovery to the two facilities where the named plaintiff worked because she offered no evidence of statewide violations.
A jury may decide whether promises to return a failed deal’s $335,000 transfer support California promissory-fraud and conversion claims.
The Northern District dismissed claims against Lufthansa because the Montreal Convention supplied the exclusive remedy and the complaint alleged no recoverable delay loss.
A removed-case plaintiff could join a nondiverse defendant, but only through the court’s discretionary analysis under Section 1447(e).
The Northern District preserved narrowly pleaded skincare false-advertising claims but dismissed theories involving unspecified products and statements.