Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Clear all
Coverage since January 1, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Litigation

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Velazquez-Ortega v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Lemon-Law Remand Where GM Documented Damages and Plaintiff Specifically Alleged Willfulness

Judge Sunshine Sykes denied remand of a Chevrolet Silverado lemon-law case where GM documented $67,065.58 in actual damages and plaintiff specifically alleged willfulness based on eight unsuccessful repair attempts, allowing civil penalties to push the amount in controversy to about $128,833 — well

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Angulo Santillano v. Wayfair LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of Wrongful-Termination Suit, Counting Punitive and Emotional-Distress Damages at 1:1 Ratios

Judge Sunshine Sykes denied remand of a Wayfair wrongful-termination suit, counting $32,302 in past lost wages plus 1:1 ratios for emotional-distress and punitive damages to reach roughly $96,908 — well above the $75,000 diversity threshold. Plaintiff’s mitigation argument was rejected because

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Vidal v. Walgreen Co. — C.D. Cal. Sua Sponte Remands Wrongful-Termination Suit, Refusing to Include Speculative Damages and Calling for Higher Diversity Threshold

Judge David O. Carter sua sponte remanded a Walgreens wrongful-termination case after refusing to credit speculative emotional-distress, punitive, and attorneys’ fees damages — leaving only $24,327 in past lost wages, well below the $75,000 threshold. He used the opinion to call on Congress to

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Vacational Bike Rentals LLC v. Kitzuma Corp. — C.D. Cal. Allows Negligence and Unjust Enrichment Claims Against Cycling Logistics Defendants Where Carmack Preemption Is Unclear

Judge Christina Snyder allowed negligence and unjust enrichment claims to proceed in a $75,000 stolen-bicycle case against Kitzuma and BikeExchange, holding that Carmack Amendment preemption could not be resolved at the motion-to-dismiss stage because the operative pleading did not clearly character

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Estrada Pelagio v. Modern Floor Specialists — C.D. Cal. Remands Janitor’s FEHA Suit, Rejects Removal Premised on IRCA/Hoffman Defense

Judge Hernán D. Vera remanded a janitor’s FEHA discrimination and wage-and-hour suit to state court, rejecting the employer’s argument that the plaintiff’s possible undocumented status and the IRCA/Hoffman back-pay defense created federal-question jurisdiction under Grable. The cou

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Mora Sandoval v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of GMC Yukon Lemon-Law Suit Where Documented Damages and Repair History Support Civil Penalties

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2021 GMC Yukon lemon-law case, holding GM had no duty to investigate beyond the complaint and the documented $78,776 in actual damages plus civil penalties (twice actual damages, supported by at least five repair attempts) brought the amount in c

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Lopez Lopez v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of Chevy Silverado Lemon-Law Suit Over $54K in Documented Damages Plus Civil Penalties

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2019 Chevy Silverado lemon-law case, holding documented actual damages of $54,232 plus civil penalties (twice actual damages, supported by at least ten repair attempts) brought the amount in controversy to roughly $162,698 — well over the $75,000

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Ascencio v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of Chevy Silverado Lemon-Law Suit Where Mileage Offset Eats Most of Purchase Price But Civil Penalties Push Past $75K

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2022 Chevy Silverado lemon-law suit where actual damages were modest ($34,932) after the mileage offset, but specific willfulness allegations and six repair attempts justified including civil penalties (twice actual damages), bringing the amount

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Mitch C. v. Bisignano — C.D. Cal. Reverses Social Security SSI Denial for Failure to Provide Clear and Convincing Reasons to Discount Schizoaffective Symptom Testimony

Magistrate Judge Maria Audero reversed an SSI denial for a claimant with schizoaffective disorder and depression, holding the ALJ failed to provide specific, clear, and convincing reasons to discount his subjective symptom testimony — and warned that ALJs cannot rely on isolated periods of improveme

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Hanna v. Youngquist — C.D. Cal. Dismisses Section 1983 Suit Against Court Reporter Over Family-Law Transcripts With Prejudice

Judge Fernando Aenlle-Rocha dismissed with prejudice a § 1983 suit against a Los Angeles court reporter who allegedly delayed producing family-law transcripts, holding that plaintiff could not show actual prejudice because his underlying state-court cases were barred by the California litigation pri

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Barrera Farret v. Ford Motor Co. — C.D. Cal. Remands Lemon-Law Suit, Rejecting Fraudulent-Joinder Attack on Dealership

Judge Stephen V. Wilson remanded a Ford lemon-law case back to state court, joining the consensus of California district courts that the economic loss rule and the California Supreme Court’s Rattagan v. Uber decision do not categorically bar negligent-repair claims against dealerships.

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Franco v. Costco Wholesale Corp. — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of Personal-Injury Case, Finding Plaintiff’s Service and Discovery Delays Were Bad Faith

Judge Michelle Williams Court denied remand of a personal-injury case against Costco that was removed more than one year after filing, finding plaintiff’s eight-month service delay and five-month discovery delay constituted bad faith under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(1).

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Reyes v. Federal Express Corp. — C.D. Cal. Remands Discrimination Suit, Rejects Worker’s Comp Preemption Theory of Fraudulent Joinder

Judge Sunshine Sykes remanded a FedEx age- and disability-discrimination suit, holding the in-state supervisor was not fraudulently joined: California law excepts discrimination and retaliation from Workers’ Comp Act preemption, and the supervisor’s alleged conduct could plausibly suppor

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Maria T. L. v. Bisignano — C.D. Cal. Reverses Social Security Disability Denial for Failure to Give Clear and Convincing Reasons to Discount Symptom Testimony

Magistrate Judge Autumn Spaeth reversed a Social Security disability denial because the ALJ summarized medical evidence without identifying which testimony she found not credible or explaining what evidence contradicted that testimony, failing the clear-and-convincing standard required by Brown-Hunt

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Lewis v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Remands Lemon-Law Suit Where Defendant Cannot Show $50K Amount in Controversy Under Magnuson-Moss Act

Judge Stephen V. Wilson remanded a Chevrolet Colorado lemon-law case, holding GM could not show even the $50,000 Magnuson-Moss amount-in-controversy threshold because actual damages were measured by payments actually made ($37,410.95), the conclusory willfulness allegation did not support adding civ

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Sanchez v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Remands Lemon-Law Suit on Volt Lease Where Mileage Offset Reduces Damages Below MMWA Threshold

Judge Stephen V. Wilson remanded a Chevrolet Volt lemon-law case after applying the Song-Beverly mileage offset (86,841 miles before first repair) to reduce damages from $42,682 to $11,794, leaving the case below both the $50,000 MMWA and $75,000 diversity thresholds.

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Bendana v. County of Orange — C.D. Cal. Dismisses Section 1983 Suit Over State Family-Law Proceedings With Prejudice

Judge Sunshine Sykes dismissed with prejudice a pro se mother’s § 1983 suit against an Orange County family-court judge, prosecutors, and the County over child-custody proceedings, citing judicial and prosecutorial immunity, Younger abstention, Rooker-Feldman, Eleventh Amendment, and failure t

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

CP6 Eastown LLC v. Noguera — C.D. Cal. Sua Sponte Remands Unlawful Detainer Removal as Lacking Federal Question Jurisdiction

Judge Cynthia Valenzuela sua sponte remanded an unlawful detainer case removed by the tenant on federal-question grounds, holding that unlawful detainer actions do not arise under federal law and federal defenses cannot support removal under Caterpillar v. Williams.

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Perez v. Texis Restaurants — C.D. Cal. Issues OSC on Declining Supplemental Jurisdiction Over Unruh Act Claim by High-Frequency ADA Litigant

Judge John A. Kronstadt ordered serial ADA plaintiff German Perez — who had filed more than ten construction-related accessibility cases in the prior year — to show cause why the court should not decline supplemental jurisdiction over his state-law Unruh Act claim, channeling it back to California s

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Delomprey v. PHH Mortgage Servicing — C.D. Cal. Grants Remand to State Court After Plaintiff Drops Federal Claims

Judge Anne Hwang granted plaintiff’s motion to remand a foreclosure suit to Ventura County Superior Court after he amended his complaint to drop federal claims, rejecting the defendants’ fraudulent-joinder argument as not meeting the Ninth Circuit’s heavy burden under Grancare.

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Hoffman v. Goli Nutrition — C.D. Cal. Grants Summary Judgment to VMG Investors on Trade Secret Claim Where Vitamin Friends Lacked Ownership

Judge Christina Snyder granted summary judgment for VMG Partners and other investors on a Defend Trade Secrets Act claim because plaintiff Vitamin Friends LLC could not show it owned the supplier trade secrets — its affiliate Better Nutritionals did. Repeat fraud, RICO, and breach-of-fiduciary-duty

Scroll to Top