The Fifth District affirmed a probate court’s interpretation of the Robert H. Fox Revocable Living Trust, holding that when all named beneficiaries died intestate and without issue, the trust assets should be distributed to the settlor’s heirs under the trust’s residual provision rather than reverting to the trustee.
The Sixth District affirmed the vacatur of a Tennessee default judgment enforced in Ohio, finding the Tennessee court lacked personal jurisdiction over the Ohio car dealer, and upheld sanctions against the pro se plaintiff for submitting AI-generated hallucinated case citations to the court.
The Third District reversed eight of nine rape convictions involving a minor victim, holding that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to distinguish each count as a separate act, while affirming convictions on one rape count and two gross sexual imposition counts.
The Third District affirmed the grant of permanent custody to a county agency, finding that both parents were unsuitable where the father, who was 50 when he began a sexual relationship with the 16-year-old mother, had a history of domestic violence and the mother remained unable to provide stable care.
The Third District affirmed a forcible entry and detainer judgment, holding that a father-son arrangement where the son occupied a mobile home on the father’s land rent-free but paid utilities and property taxes created a landlord-tenant relationship and a month-to-month tenancy under Ohio law.
The Third District affirmed a conviction under R.C. 4511.204, Ohio’s distracted driving statute, rejecting constitutional challenges based on equal protection, due process, and vagueness, and holding that holding a phone for GPS navigation while driving violates the statute.
The Eleventh District sua sponte dismissed an appeal from a probate court’s partial summary judgment on heirship, holding that the order was not a final appealable order under R.C. 2505.02 because it resolved only one party’s rights while leaving other parties’ heirship determinations for further proceedings.
The Eleventh District reversed a finding of concealment of estate assets under R.C. 2109.50, holding that the statute applies only to property the decedent owned at the time of death, not to assets transferred during the decedent’s lifetime under a power of attorney.
The Eleventh District dismissed a mandamus petition challenging a city’s billboard moratorium, holding that the relator failed to name the building administrator (the individual with the duty to act) and that the city building department, as a non-sui juris entity, could not be a mandamus respondent.
The Eleventh District affirmed the dismissal of abuse, neglect, and dependency allegations against prospective adoptive parents of an infant with multiple serious medical conditions, holding that the trial court properly excluded an expert witness for failure to comply with Civ.R. 26(B)(7)(c) and that the dismissal was supported by the manifest weight of the evidence.