The Tenth District affirmed the probate court’s denial of a motion to vacate an order settling the final estate account, holding the heir failed to demonstrate fraud, good cause, or any statutory ground under R.C. 2109.35.
The Tenth District affirmed the denial of a contempt motion in a divorce case, holding that failure to file timely objections to a magistrate’s decision and failure to provide the hearing transcript to the appellate court were fatal procedural defects.
The Tenth District affirmed the constitutionality of R.C. 2923.13(A)(2) as applied to a defendant whose prior juvenile adjudication for felonious assault served as the predicate disability, finding historical support under the Bruen framework.
The Tenth District affirmed a juvenile delinquency adjudication, holding that a magistrate who presided over a related co-defendant’s case was not required to recuse from the second juvenile’s hearing absent a showing of actual bias.
The Sixth District affirmed the trial court’s decision to exclude a minor child from a domestic violence protection order where a custody and visitation order already existed in juvenile court and limited evidence connected the child to the domestic violence.
The Tenth District affirmed the denial of a postconviction petition without a hearing where the petitioner failed to produce substantive evidence demonstrating that Blink home security camera recordings existed or were withheld by the state.
The Fifth District affirmed convictions for obstructing official business and assaulting a police dog where the defendant fled from deputies serving warrants, hid from a K-9 search, and kicked the dog when it found him.
The Fifth District affirmed summary judgment for deputies in a K-9 bite case, holding that claims alleging a duty to intervene in a K-9 attack are essentially battery claims governed by the one-year statute of limitations, not custodial negligence claims.
The Fifth District affirmed the juvenile court’s decision to transfer jurisdiction of a 16-year-old charged with aggravated robbery and felonious assault to adult court, finding the amenability determination was supported by competent, credible evidence.
The Twelfth District affirmed the denial of an adoptive father’s Civ.R. 60(B) motion to vacate a child support order, holding that the father’s failure to raise R.C. 2151.361(B) at the original hearing or in a timely appeal foreclosed relief from the support obligation.