Garcia v. State — Rule 35(b) denial required no detailed explanation
The Wyoming Supreme Court held that a court need not explain a Rule 35(b) denial in detail and that rehabilitation alone does not require a sentence reduction.
The Wyoming Supreme Court held that a court need not explain a Rule 35(b) denial in detail and that rehabilitation alone does not require a sentence reduction.
The Wyoming Supreme Court held that time spent jailed on independent Iowa charges did not count toward a Wyoming sentence and declined to review a later counsel order that was not identified in a notice of appeal.
The Wyoming Supreme Court held that jail time already credited to a probation-revocation sentence did not have to be credited again in two separate felony cases.
The Wyoming Supreme Court unanimously affirmed consecutive sentences for a former Casper police officer who pleaded guilty to five counts of aggravated assault and battery following a prolonged armed standoff, holding that a plea agreement capping the State’s “sentencing argument” was a non-binding recommendation under W.R.Cr.P. 11(e)(1)(B)—not a stipulated sentence under 11(e)(1)(C)—and that Wyoming district courts need not make specific findings when deviating from a sentencing recommendation.