Appellate Procedure Cases
Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since May 8, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Appellate Procedure

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Uncategorized

Kapish v. Bureau of Driver Licensing — Ten-Year Court-Caused Delay in License Suspension Hearing Mandates Reversal Under Middaugh Due Process Test

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania reversed the denial of a license suspension appeal, holding that Court Administration’s ten-year failure to schedule a hearing — despite repeated court orders to do so — constituted an extraordinary government-caused delay that violated the licensee’s due process rights under the Middaugh framework and mandated dismissal of the suspension.

Texas Court of Appeals, Thirteenth District (Corpus Christi–Edinburg)
Uncategorized

In Re Germania Farm Mutual — Texas Appeals Court Compels Insurance Appraisal Despite Insurer’s Full Claim Denial

The Thirteenth Court of Appeals conditionally granted mandamus compelling appraisal in a homeowner’s insurance dispute, holding that Germania’s outright claim denial did not preclude appraisal and that the policyholder failed to establish waiver or prejudice from any delay in demanding the process.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Matter of Carville v. Clark — DA’s Article 78 Challenge to CPL 160.50 Unsealing Order Dismissed

The Fourth Department dismissed a district attorney’s Article 78 petition seeking to overturn a court order barring re-presentment to a grand jury and denying unsealing under CPL 160.50(1), holding that unsealing applications are civil in nature and cannot be challenged via Article 78.

Wyoming Supreme Court
Uncategorized

Moran v. Meadowlark Academy — Conservator Who Waited 190 Days to Answer Counterclaims Cannot Set Aside Default Without Articulating Rule 60(b) Grounds

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a default judgment entered against a conservator who waited 190 days to answer counterclaims and then failed to move to set aside the default with any citation to W.R.C.P. 55(c) or 60(b), failed to identify a Rule 60(b) justification, and failed to address the three-factor good cause test. A vague oral request to set aside default, unsupported by legal authority, does not satisfy the moving party’s burden.

Texas Court of Appeals (Second District, Fort Worth)
Uncategorized

Atmos Energy v. DPC Parker Properties — Order Enforcing Rule 11 Settlement Does Not Function as a Temporary Injunction and Is Not Subject to Interlocutory Appeal

The Fort Worth Court of Appeals dismissed Atmos Energy’s interlocutory appeal of a trial court order enforcing a Rule 11 mediated settlement in an eminent-domain dispute, holding that the order did not function as a temporary injunction because it compelled performance based on the parties’ own agreement rather than any merits determination.

Texas Court of Appeals, Thirteenth District (Corpus Christi–Edinburg)
Uncategorized

City of Edinburg v. Texas Cordia Construction — City Cannot Block Contractor’s Immunity Evidence by Limiting Its Jurisdictional Challenge to Pleadings

The Thirteenth Court of Appeals held that a city cannot bar a contractor from presenting jurisdictional evidence by framing its plea to the jurisdiction as a pleadings-only challenge, and that amounts owed under a termination-for-convenience clause are “due and owed” within the Texas Local Government Code’s immunity waiver.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Uncategorized

Phillips v. United States — Court Affirms Convictions but Remands Sentence Over Missing Prior-Conviction Inquiry

The DC Court of Appeals affirmed Bryant Phillips’s convictions for sexual abuse, kidnapping, and assault but remanded for resentencing, holding that the trial court failed to conduct the mandatory statutory inquiry under D.C. Code § 23-111(b) before imposing a life-without-parole sentence as a repeat violent offender.

Scroll to Top