Civil Procedure Cases
Coverage since January 2, 2026

Civil Procedure

Uncategorized

Yamamoto v. Federal Express Corp. — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of Class-Action Wage Suit Where CAFA Amount in Controversy and Diversity Are Established

Judge Percy Anderson denied remand of a FedEx wage-and-hour class action, holding CAFA’s minimal diversity and $5 million amount-in-controversy thresholds were both established by conservative assumptions and workforce evidence. The court rejected plaintiff’s Sonner argument because the

Uncategorized

Pirro v. U.S. Bank — C.D. Cal. Remands FEHA Whistleblower Suit, Holding Self-Serving Denial Cannot Defeat Aiding-and-Abetting Claim Against In-State Defendant

Judge Dale S. Fischer remanded a FEHA whistleblower-retaliation suit against U.S. Bank, holding that Bogaski’s self-serving denial declaration could not establish fraudulent joinder where the plaintiff could possibly amend to allege the FEHA aiding-and-abetting elements (knowledge plus substan

Uncategorized

Perez v. Arroyo Building Materials — C.D. Cal. Issues OSC on Supplemental Jurisdiction Over Unruh Act Claim by High-Frequency ADA Litigant

Judge Fernando Aenlle-Rocha ordered serial ADA plaintiff German Perez to show cause why the court should not decline supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim under Schutza v. Cuddeback, requiring a declaration on his high-frequency-litigant status under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 425.55.

Uncategorized

Koeller v. Nixplay — N.D. Cal. denies remand of CLRA digital photo frame consumer suit, finds complete diversity despite shifting corporate citizenship allegations

Magistrate Judge DeMarchi denies remand of a putative class action by Nixplay digital-photo-frame customers, holding that complete diversity exists between the plaintiffs and Nixplay, Inc. (Delaware/U.K.) and Creedon Technologies USA, LLC (Hong Kong via its sole member), even though defendants’ init

Uncategorized

Gifford v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of GMC Sierra 2500 Lemon-Law Suit Where Mileage Offset Erodes Damages but Civil Penalties and Repair History Save Federal Jurisdiction

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2019 GMC Sierra 2500 lemon-law case, holding documented actual damages of $41,341 plus civil penalties (twice actual damages, supported by nine unsuccessful repair attempts) brought the amount in controversy to roughly $124,023 — well over the $7

Uncategorized

Real v. Amazon Retail LLC — C.D. Cal. Sua Sponte Remands Wrongful-Termination Suit, Refusing to Credit Speculative Damages and Reiterating Federalism Critique

Judge David O. Carter sua sponte remanded an Amazon employee’s wrongful-termination suit, refusing to credit speculative emotional-distress, punitive, and attorneys’ fees damages — leaving roughly $71,780 in calculated wages and vacation, just under the $75,000 threshold. He again called

Uncategorized

Graham v. DuPont De Nemours, Inc. — C.D. Cal. Dismisses Duplicative Mining-Royalty Suit and Sanctions Plaintiffs for Bad-Faith Ex Parte Practice

Judge Fernando Aenlle-Rocha dismissed pro se plaintiffs’ fifth duplicative lawsuit alleging a $22 billion mining-royalty price-fixing conspiracy, granted defendants’ motion for § 1927 sanctions for bad-faith ex parte filings (despite two prior warnings), and ordered plaintiffs to show ca

Scroll to Top