Case JAMICHAEL WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA Court District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District Judge PER CURIAM; KELLY,
Case Mark Alfred Clarkson v Ray White Gladstone in their capacity as agents for Pateliz Pty Ltd ACN 140 473
Case People of the State of Michigan v. Jimmy Lee Fuller Court Michigan Court of Appeals Judge BORRELLO, P.J.; BAZZI,
Case State of North Dakota v. Daniel Philip Carpenter Court North Dakota Supreme Court Judge Jon J. Jensen, Justice Date
Case State of North Dakota v. Colton Kenneth Defoe Court North Dakota Supreme Court Judge Lisa Fair McEvers, C.J.; Douglas
Case Obed Agha v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Court Federal Court (Canada) Date Decided November 6, 2026 Citation
Case Ford Motor Company v. Charles Winegardner, et al. Court Appellate Court of Maryland Judge Graeff; Friedman; Wright, Alexander, Jr.
Case Profad Care Agency Limited v The Secretary of State for the Home Department Court High Court of Justice, King’s
Case State of Kansas v. Efrain Garcia-Castillo Court Kansas Court of Appeals Judge HILL, P.J.; ARNOLD-BURGER, J.; ANDREA PURVIS, District
Case Hojae Antonio Martin v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Court Federal Court (Canada) Date Decided November 6, 2026
Case Zeeshan Mian v Solicitors Regulation Authority Limited Court High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (United Kingdom)
Case Deborah Stevenson v The Nursing and Midwifery Council Court High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (United
The Ninth Circuit affirmed Mark Ridley-Thomas’s convictions, holding that routing $100,000 through USC to benefit his son’s nonprofit was a thing of value supporting honest-services fraud and federal-program bribery.
The Ninth Circuit reversed Abdul Malik Abdul Kareem’s conviction for conspiring to provide material support to ISIS, holding that evidence of ideological sympathy and independent violence inspired by a terrorist group’s propaganda cannot sustain a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B witho
The Ninth Circuit vacated a certificate of appealability because its certified question presented no constitutional issue and could provide no effectual relief, declined to expand it to the Double Jeopardy claim, and dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
California’s Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed denial of Alex Bocanegra’s mandate petition, finding no unconstitutional advocacy by the DMV hearing officer and relying on a sworn DS-367 form to establish a proper implied-consent warning.
The First District Court of Appeal reversed a parole revocation order because the prosecution presented no evidence that Kenneth Adrian Fuller was actually on parole when the alleged violation occurred, holding that parole status must be proven even if the defendant never raises the issue before the
The Court of Appeal affirmed an order suspending execution of sentence and granting probation after a jury convicted Earl Lamont Rogers of domestic violence offenses, holding that he forfeited his challenge to the admission of a prior threatening phone call by failing to object on the specific groun
The Court of Appeal affirmed Jessie Cornejo Ambriz’s convictions and seven-year, four-month prison sentence, concluding that his statement during a prolonged strangulation and suffocation attack supported a criminal-threat conviction and that the sole trial error was harmless.
The Court of Appeal affirmed Sandra Garcia’s convictions for conspiracy to commit kidnapping, sexual penetration by force, kidnapping a child under 14, torture, and dissuading a witness, rejecting her claims of Sixth Amendment violations, instructional error, insufficient evidence, and an exce
The Fifth District upheld three child-sex convictions because explicit bathtub photographs permitted a reasonable inference supporting the corpus delicti, rejected constitutional challenges to the indeterminate sentences, and vacated unauthorized concurrent terms on 14 other counts.
The court granted a habeas petition and ordered the immediate release of a noncitizen detained without a warrant, finding the arrest violated 8 U.S.C. § 1226 and deprived him of due process.
A federal district court granted a temporary restraining order requiring the immediate release of three individuals detained by ICE, finding their warrantless arrests likely violated federal immigration law.
The district court adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations and dismissed Anthony Jeffries’s amended complaint without leave to amend, rejecting his Bivens claim and holding that his Federal Tort Claims Act allegations did not satisfy the statutory physical-injury requirement.