State v. Ferreira — Hawaii appeals court vacates assault conviction due to deficient right-to-testify colloquy
Case State of Hawaii v. Cory M. Ferreira Court Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Date Decided July 14, 2026 Docket […]
Case State of Hawaii v. Cory M. Ferreira Court Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Date Decided July 14, 2026 Docket […]
Case Jason K. Perry v. State of Hawai’i Court Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Date Decided July 13, 2026 Docket
Case State of Hawai’i v. David Richard Stevens Court Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Date Decided June 25, 2026 Docket
Case State of Hawai’i v. Natisha Tautalatasi Court Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Date Decided June 24, 2026 Docket No.
Case State of Hawai’i v. Justin Joshua Serrano Eugenio Court Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Date Decided June 19, 2026
Case State of Hawai’i v. Kaden K. Kanae Court Hawai’i Intermediate Court of Appeals Date Decided June 19, 2026 Docket
Case State of Hawai’i v. Lori Landon Court Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Date Decided June 19, 2026 Docket No.
Case State of Hawai’i v. Sonny E. Puerto Court Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Date Decided June 16, 2026 Docket
Case State of Hawaiʻi v. Currena Tomie Meyers Court Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Judge Keith K. Hiraoka (David Y.
Case State of Hawaii v. Landon Kalanikoa Fernandez Court Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Judge Leonard (Linda Lingle, 2007); Wadsworth
The ICA reversed an excessive speeding conviction because the State failed to prove the manufacturer’s specific training requirements for the LIDAR device, as required under the Assaye/Amiral framework.
The ICA affirmed an excessive speeding conviction, holding that evidence of driving 92 mph in a 60-mph zone was sufficient to prove recklessness under HRS § 291C-105(a)(2), regardless of the defendant’s subjective reason for accelerating.
In a published opinion, the ICA held that district courts exceed their statutory authority when requiring OVUII defendants to appear for substance abuse compliance hearings, extending the Supreme Court’s Fay decision and holding such hearings are impermissibly akin to probation.