Davis v. District Court — Psychology rule cannot restrict civil discovery
The Nevada Supreme Court held that a psychology-board regulation cannot prevent courts from ordering disclosure of raw psychological test data in civil discovery.
The Nevada Supreme Court held that a psychology-board regulation cannot prevent courts from ordering disclosure of raw psychological test data in civil discovery.
The Nevada Supreme Court held that NRS 52.325 is not the exclusive route for authenticating medical records and ordered a new personal-injury trial after key records and medical-lien evidence were excluded.
The Nevada Supreme Court reversed Allen’s convictions for sexual assault on a minor, holding en banc that a district court abused its discretion in finding A.S.’s juvenile records of a nearly identical prior sexual offense irrelevant to Allen’s alternative-suspect defense. The court found the error was not harmless where it foreclosed pretrial investigation, terminated the admissibility inquiry, the jury independently indicated interest in the alternative suspect, and the State exploited the exclusion to elicit misleading testimony.