Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Clear all
Coverage since May 26, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Real Property

Supreme Court of Guam
Uncategorized

In re Estate of Pangelinan — Supreme Court of Guam Holds Pro Se Executor Need Not Retain Counsel to Petition for Letters Testamentary

The Supreme Court of Guam unanimously reversed a probate court’s refusal to appoint a named executor, holding that neither a law license nor retained counsel is required to petition for letters testamentary under the Guam Probate Code, and that the statutory grounds of “improvidence” or “want of understanding” cannot be established solely by the petitioner’s failure to retain an attorney — even where the probate court acknowledged a severe attorney shortage on the island.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Uncategorized

Mt. Pleasant Investments v. Charleston County Assessor — ATI Exemption Caps Tax Value at Pre-Sale Baseline, Not Pre-Sale Plus Pre-ATI Improvements

The South Carolina Court of Appeals reversed the Administrative Law Court’s property tax ruling, holding that the “current fair market value” floor for the ATI exemption is the pre-sale value on the assessor’s books—not that value inflated by improvements the prior owner completed before the sale closed. Because the improvements were already incorporated into the ATI fair market value of $8,034,000 used to compute the exemption value, the Assessor’s approach of re-adding them to the current fair market value floor impermissibly double-counted them. The taxable value for tax year 2022 was $6,063,000, not $6,821,000.

Court of Appeals of Utah
Uncategorized

Johnson v. Moab City — Utah’s 1886 Townsite Plat Vested Title Before the 1890 Federal Patent, Defeating a Century-Long Adverse Possession Claim

The Utah Court of Appeals reversed a partial summary judgment that had quieted most of a disputed downtown Moab parcel to a private landowner, holding that the 1886 Moab Townsite Plat vested title in the municipality before the 1890 federal Luster Patent issued, that Utah’s rebuttable presumption of official regularity supplies the missing historical documentation, and that adverse possession cannot run against government land designated for public use regardless of how long the private use has continued.

Scroll to Top