Breach of Contract Cases
Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since October 9, 2025
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Breach of Contract

Uncategorized

Gamma Homes v. Atlanta Real Estate Specialty Group — Court of Appeals Reverses Involuntary Dismissal in Property Management Dispute

The Court of Appeals reversed an involuntary dismissal in a property management dispute, holding that the property owner’s testimony alone was sufficient to prove damages and that excluded software reports were admissible as both business records and admissions by a party opponent.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Broadway Warehouse v. Buffalo Barn — Fourth Department Rejects “Fees on Fees” Under Commercial Lease

The Fourth Department held that a standard commercial lease attorney’s fees clause does not authorize “fees on fees” — recovery of fees incurred to collect a prior attorney’s fee award — absent unmistakably clear contractual language, and further held that failure to object to a referee’s denial of CPLR 5001 prejudgment interest waives that argument on appeal.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

University Hill Realty v. Akl — Broker Commission Claim Revived Based on Post-Expiration Text Messages

The Fourth Department reversed summary judgment for property-owner defendants and reinstated a real estate broker’s commission claim, finding that post-expiration text messages discussing incoming offers created a triable issue whether the parties formed an implied-in-fact contract for brokerage services.

Wyoming Supreme Court
Uncategorized

Smerski v. Lemon — Wyoming Supreme Court Reverses Divorce Decree That Misread Postnuptial Agreement on Retirement Account Division

The Wyoming Supreme Court reversed a divorce decree that treated all retirement accounts listed in postnuptial agreement exhibits as entirely separate property. The court held that the agreement’s express exclusion of retirement accounts from its “separate property” definition, combined with Paragraph 5(g)’s specific formula dividing pre- and post-June 2017 contributions, required the district court to apply the formula to the listed accounts as well.

Texas Court of Appeals, Fifteenth District
Uncategorized

Elite Concepts v. Field — “Repair” Clause in Pool Construction Contract Encompasses Cost to Complete; Contractor Who Walks Off Job Cannot Claim Attorney’s Fees as Prevailing Party

The Fifteenth Court of Appeals held that a pool construction contract’s limitation of remedy to “repair” encompasses cost-to-complete damages as well as cost-to-repair, because construing “repair” to exclude unfinished work would render the contractor’s promise illusory; it also held that a contractor whose quantum meruit recovery is offset by the owner’s larger breach-of-contract damages award is not a “prevailing party” entitled to Chapter 38 attorney’s fees.

Ohio Court of Appeals (Eighth District)
Uncategorized

Reminger Co. v. Fishman — Eighth District affirms summary judgment for law firm in fee dispute, holds pro se litigant to procedural standards

The Eighth District affirmed summary judgment in favor of Reminger Co. in a breach-of-contract action to collect unpaid legal fees, holding that the pro se defendant’s failure to comply with appellate briefing rules and support his assignments of error with argument and authority was fatal.

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Uncategorized

Outer Banks Ventures, Inc. v. Currituck County — Developer’s 1986 Water and Sewer Reimbursement Agreement Not an Installment Contract; Claims Against County Time-Barred

The North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment dismissing a developer’s twelve-year-old breach-of-contract claim against Currituck County under an assumed water and sewer reimbursement agreement, holding that the 1986 developer agreement was not an installment contract because the county’s payment obligation was contingent on its own decision to connect customers, making the consideration unified and all claims time-barred under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-53(1)’s two-year limitations period.

Scroll to Top