Tritonia Wind Farm — Supreme Administrative Court lets government’s permit denial stand
Case Tritonia Vindpark AB v. Government of Sweden Court Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden (Sweden) Date Decided October 29, 2026
Uncategorized
Constitutional
Uncategorized
Saywell v Comcare (No 2) — Court refused extra time for a meritless FOI appeal
Case Saywell v Comcare (No 2) Court Federal Court of Australia (Australia) Judge Stewart Maxwell Anderson (Governor-General of Australia Sir
Uncategorized
TJ Trading Express — Court of Appeal restored sponsor-licence revocation despite one unlawful ground
Case R (on the application of TJ Trading Express Limited) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court Court
Uncategorized
Abdul v Tower Hamlets — High Court granted permission but excluded the council’s late materials and denied related costs
Case R (on the application of Rayaan Abdul, a minor, by his litigation friend Mabel Abdul) v London Borough of
Uncategorized
California Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta — Ninth Circuit Keeps Injunction Against Employer Political-Meeting Law
The Ninth Circuit kept SB 399 preliminarily enjoined because the employer political- and religious-meeting law is likely a content-based speech restriction that fails strict scrutiny.
Uncategorized
Gallegos v. Spencer — Prisoner’s Religious-Exercise Pleading Failed to State a Claim
The magistrate judge concluded that the first amended complaint fails to state a cognizable claim under § 1983 and recommended dismissal with prejudice. On the Free Exercise claim, the court found Gallegos failed to allege facts showing tha
Uncategorized
Velazquez Benavides v. Warden — Delay in Providing a Section 1226(a) Hearing Supports Release
The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the habeas petition and ordering petitioner’s immediate release. The court held that under Ninth Circuit precedent in Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock, 183 F.4th 1160 (9th Cir. 2026), petitioner—who ente
Uncategorized
Colon Guzman v. Chestnut — Failure to Provide a Section 1226(a) Hearing Supports Release
The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the habeas petition and ordering Petitioner’s immediate release. The court adopts the reasoning of Brayan C.C., Benitos A.P., and Juan R.R., finding that Petitioner—who entered on a valid visa and bu
Uncategorized
Echevarria Galvez v. Director — Re-Detention Without a Pre-Deprivation Hearing Violated Due Process
The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Respondents conceded that the case is not materially distinguishable from Lida G.B. v. Albarran, Wistong F. v. ICE, and Charan S. v. Warden, in which the court
Uncategorized
Liu Shengen v. Warden — Court Lifts No-Transfer Order but Leaves Habeas Merits Open
The Court granted Respondent’s request to lift the no-transfer order. The Magistrate Judge found Respondent’s showing sufficient because Petitioner appears subject to a final expedited removal order and the government has obtained a valid t
Uncategorized
Ipina Mendoza v. Warden — Court Orders Bond Hearing Instead of Immediate Release
The court found re-detention without advance process unconstitutional but ordered a prompt bond hearing rather than immediate release because of an intervening arrest report.
Uncategorized
Hassan K. — Four Months of Mandatory Immigration Detention Upheld
The Court denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus without prejudice.
Uncategorized
Josue R.R. — Texas Marijuana Conviction Did Not Require Mandatory Immigration Detention
The Court granted the petition in part, holding that Petitioner’s Texas marijuana conviction does not trigger mandatory detention under § 1226(c) because the Texas statute governing his January 2019 offense included hemp, which federal law had excluded from the definition of marijuana effectiv
Uncategorized
Carrillo de Leon v. Warden — Magistrate Judge Recommends Enhanced Bond Hearing
A magistrate judge recommended waiving exhaustion and ordering an enhanced bond hearing because detention caused serious household financial hardship.
Uncategorized
Fozilov v. Chestnut — Magistrate Judge Recommends Release After Parole Revocation Without a Hearing
A magistrate judge recommended immediate release because ICE re-detained an asylum applicant previously released on humanitarian parole without advance notice or a hearing.
Uncategorized
Estrada v. Warden — Magistrate Judge Recommends a Bond Hearing, Not Release
Petitioner was present in the interior of the United States when he was detained by ICE, and removal proceedings are ongoing. As respondent concedes, the applicable detention authority is 8 U.S.C. § 1226. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), the government has discretion whether to release or detain an individ
Uncategorized
Paredes Salazar v. Andrews — Court Orders a Bond Hearing Within 14 Days
As Respondents concede, and pursuant to Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock, 183 F.4th 1160, 1165 (9th Cir. 2026), the Court finds that § 1226(a) governs Petitioner’s detention. Petitioner falls into a class of non-citizens who were apprehended in the interior of the United States without ever being admitt
Uncategorized
Sonu v. Mullin — ICE Must Provide Process Before Re-Detaining a Released Noncitizen
Petitioner was arrested while attending a scheduled ICE check-in, demonstrating a willingness to abide by his reporting obligations, rather than a risk of flight. There is no reason then why notice and an opportunity to contest his re-detention could not have been provided before Petitioner’s
Uncategorized
Vilca v. Blanche — Court Orders Release After Re-Detention Without a Bond Hearing
Because Respondents have not made any new legal arguments and have not identified any factual or legal issues in this case that would distinguish it from the court’s aforementioned prior decisions, the court will grant Petitioner’s motion for temporary restraining order (Doc. No. 2) and petition for
Uncategorized
Singh v. Wofford — Court Orders Release After Re-Detention Without a Hearing
For the reasons identified in Soumare, Zheng, and Sifonte applying the Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976) framework, Petitioner is entitled to a hearing at which the Government must justify the basis for revocation of his parole. Petitioner has a substantial private interest in maintaining his
Uncategorized
Cannavan v. Newsom — Duplicative Dismissals Count as Strikes and Alleged Danger Was Too Speculative
Duplicative Dismissals Count as Strikes and Alleged Danger Was Too Speculative.
Uncategorized
Silva Angamarca v. Andrews — Immigration Judge Must Reconsider Bond Using All Relevant Factors
Immigration Judge Must Reconsider Bond Using All Relevant Factors.
Uncategorized
Fransly R.L.J. v. Chestnut — Court Requires Bond Hearing Within Seven Days
Court Requires Bond Hearing Within Seven Days.
Uncategorized
Ramirez Baten v. Warden — Ninth Circuit Rule Supports Bond Hearing and Recommended Injunction
The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the habeas petition on both statutory and due process grounds. Relying on the intervening Ninth Circuit decision in Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock, 183 F.4th 1160 (9th Cir. 2026), the Court held that.