A magistrate judge dismissed a parent’s 41-count complaint with leave to amend, barred pro se representation of the minor child, and recommended denial of an unsupported TRO.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of the preliminary injunction.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of the habeas petition.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of Eltareb’s § 2255 motion.
The Ninth Circuit reversed the Rule 41(b) dismissal, holding the district court abused its discretion because a less drastic alternative—entering final judgment on the prior Rule 12(b)(1) dismissal—was available, CPC’s conduct did not prejudice the defendant, and the court failed to warn CPC o
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence. First, the court held that no Fourth Amendment seizure occurred at the gas station because, even assuming Sergeant Gillen’s conduct constituted a show of authority, Zamora did not submit to it; instead, he fled. Under California v. Hodari
The Court granted the joint motion in full.
The Court denied Defendants’ Rule 59(e) motion, finding they failed to demonstrate the September 14 Order was “manifestly unjust” or that media controversy resulted from the Court’s recitation of facts.
The court screened the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) and found that Jones’s allegations—specifically that on November 27, 2025, he reported to Sergeant Castro that an inmate sexually assaulted him after he refused to ‘cell up,’ and that Castro refused his request to contact the In
Plaintiff alleges she received a single ‘unsolicited commercial email, which consumed her time and attention, burdened her inbox, and caused unwanted processing and network activity.’ …
Defendants have not made the requisite showing ‘that a stay is necessary to avoid likely irreparable harm’ while their appeal is pending.
A magistrate judge recommended $10,426.28 in EAJA fees for a successful immigration habeas petitioner after excluding clerical time.
An Eastern District magistrate judge held that factual disagreements, jurisdictional admissions, and a prior screening order did not justify striking defendants’ answer.
A magistrate judge recommended $14,755 in EAJA fees after finding the government’s defense of renewed immigration detention was not substantially justified.
The court ordered immediate release because ICE revoked decades of implied supervised release without the procedures required by due process and federal regulations.
The court waived exhaustion and ordered a § 1226(a) bond hearing after ICE failed to provide the hearing Astorga Basaulto had requested.
The magistrate judge granted respondents’ motion for reconsideration of a document-production order only to the extent of excusing compliance, treating the failure to produce records as a concession that petitioner’s factual allegations are undisputed.
The magistrate judge recommended granting the habeas petition, denying Respondents’ motion to dismiss, and ordering Tayson’s immediate release.
The court granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint.
A magistrate judge found no proof that Pena’s alleged offenses resulted in serious bodily injury and recommended a bond hearing under § 1226(a).
A federal magistrate judge granted an immigration detainee’s habeas petition, treating the government’s failure to appear or respond as a concession and directing that judgment be entered, with the detainee returned to California and released under her prior conditions.
A federal magistrate judge granted Giann Rangel’s unopposed § 2241 petition and ordered his immediate release subject to the same conditions as his pre-arrest order of supervision after immigration respondents failed to appear or show cause by the court’s deadline.
A federal magistrate judge in the Central District of California granted a habeas corpus petition and ordered the immediate release of a Venezuelan asylum seeker who was detained at an airport without any prior notice or hearing, finding that the government’s prolonged decision to leave him at
A federal magistrate judge in the Central District of California granted a habeas petition and ordered ICE to immediately release a longtime resident, holding that detaining him without a pre-deprivation bond hearing violated the Fifth Amendment.