Rapid Legal Solutions v Queensland — Court of Appeal dismisses challenge to claim-farming investigation powers
Case Rapid Legal Solutions Pty Ltd v State of Queensland Court Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Queensland (Australia) Date
Case Rapid Legal Solutions Pty Ltd v State of Queensland Court Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Queensland (Australia) Date
Case L & L International Investment Pty Ltd v Body Corporate for Arundel Springs East CTS 53560 Court Court of
Case KenoGO Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia Court Supreme Court of New South Wales (Australia) Date Decided 5 November
The First Department removed gang, substance-use, and psychiatric probation conditions that had no evidentiary relationship to the defendant’s offense or rehabilitation.
The First Department vacated a Section 1988 fee award because a successful hemp retailer challenged its OATH hearing only under state law and raised no federal claim until after judgment.
The Superior Court held that later expert reports did not create newly discovered facts under the PCRA when the petitioner had learned the factual basis for his claims from an expert report 15 years earlier.
The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed two aggravated-murder convictions, holding that abundant evidence allowed the jury to reject both perfect and imperfect self-defense.
The Utah Court of Appeals held that a parent need not subjectively appreciate the danger of intentional conduct when that conduct objectively creates an unreasonable risk of harm to a child.
Case Loyeung v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court Federal Court (Canada) Date Decided November 5, 2026 Citation 2026 FC 1360
Case Fabian Rodrigo Lugo Zapata and Nellely Dominguez Dominguez v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Court Federal Court (Canada)
Case Christopher Franklin, in His Official Capacity as Mayor of the City of Helena-West Helena, Arkansas v. State of Arkansas
Case European Commission (C‑266/24 P), Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (C‑269/24 P), and Société Air France SA and Air France-KLM SA
Case Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Bizerba SE & Co. KG Court Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) Date
Case Ashton v State of New South Wales (No 2) Court Supreme Court of New South Wales (Australia) Date Decided
Case City of Strongsville v. Michael Thomas Smith Court Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth Appellate District, County of Cuyahoga
Case Population and Immigration Authority – Legal Department, Headquarters, Mena, Jerusalem v. Oksana Kuzmina and Yelizaveta Kuzmina Court Supreme Court
Case R (Treal Care (UK) Limited) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Case Abdo Metal & Industry Ltd. v. Israel Land Authority—Northern District Court Supreme Court of Israel Date Decided November 5,
The Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Two, affirmed Matthew Negrete’s convictions and 25-years-to-life sentence, holding that the trial court properly instructed the jury on the alleged offense timeframe and did not abuse its discretion in declining to disclose school records after in
A federal magistrate judge ordered a new immigration bond hearing with a Spanish interpreter within 14 days, finding an unrebutted due process violation but denying release and the petitioner’s remaining claims.
The Ninth Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction against Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act and remanded to the district court to dismiss the case as moot because the plaintiff was no longer enrolled at Boise State and offered only a conclusory statement of intent to re-enroll with
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of Robert Conrady’s habeas corpus petition, holding that his trial counsel’s performance during court-martial proceedings did not fall below constitutional standards despite counsel’s decision not to call defense witnesses.
A firefighter fired for refusing to attend his disciplinary hearing cannot challenge his termination by arguing he was actually fired for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine, but the City violated his due process rights by placing him on unpaid leave without following proper procedures.
California’s Second District Court of Appeal affirmed Marvion Templeton’s firearm conviction, holding that an officer’s observations during a lawful registration stop supported further investigation and that Templeton forfeited his separate challenge to the search of a pill bottle.