Constitutional Cases
Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided): –
Clear all
Coverage since December 10, 2004
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Constitutional

Uncategorized

J.L.C. v. Warden of the Golden State Annex, et al. — Federal court orders immediate release because immigration officials detained the petitioner without required pre-deprivation process

The Eastern District of California granted J.L.C.’s habeas petition and temporary restraining order, finding that immigration officials detained him without the pre-deprivation procedures required by 8 C.F.R. §§ 241.4 and 241.13 and ordering his immediate release.

Uncategorized

Jason Marta v. CDCR — Magistrate Judge Frank J. Singer denies prisoner’s request for appointed counsel without prejudice

Magistrate Judge Frank J. Singer of the Eastern District of California denied a state prisoner’s motion for appointment of counsel in his Americans with Disabilities Act civil rights case, finding no exceptional circumstances even though the claim had survived screening and summary judgment.

Uncategorized

Pedro Enrique Miranda Avila v. Warden, California City ICE Detention Facility, et al. — Federal Court Grants Habeas Corpus and Orders Immediate Release for Due Process Violation

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California granted a habeas corpus petition and temporary restraining order, finding that ICE violated a Venezuelan national’s Fifth Amendment due process rights by detaining him without providing the pre-deprivation process required by feder

Uncategorized

Claudio Anthonino Busto v. Warden, California City Detention Center — Federal court grants habeas petition and orders immediate release of immigration detainee held without pre-deprivation hearing

A federal district court granted a pro se habeas petition and ordered the immediate release of an immigration detainee, finding that his detention without a pre-deprivation hearing violated due process and that a later bond hearing did not cure the violation.

Uncategorized

Traci Simpson v. County of Santa Clara — Court Allows Retaliation and Defamation Claims to Proceed While Dismissing Discrimination and Certain Due Process Claims

The Northern District of California granted in part and denied in part the County’s motion to dismiss, allowing Title VII and FEHA retaliation, Labor Code § 1102.5, stigma-plus due process, and defamation claims to proceed while dismissing discrimination and certain § 1983 claims with leave to

Uncategorized

Denzel Bain v. Warden of the California City Immigration Processing Center, et al. — Habeas Petition Denied Without Prejudice; Detention Under § 1226(a) With Bond Hearing Does Not Violate Due Process

A federal district court denied a habeas petition challenging continued immigration detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), holding that the petitioner received the process due to him and that the Constitution does not require the government to bear the burden of proof at bond hearings.

Uncategorized

Jorge Alejandro Valencia Perez v. David Venturella, et al. — Federal court orders immediate release of immigration detainee held without required custody procedures

The Eastern District of California granted an immigration detainee’s habeas petition and ordered his immediate release because the record contained no evidence that the government followed the custody-determination procedures required by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).

Uncategorized

Reilandy Gonzalez Moreno v. Markwayne Mullin, et al. — Court grants habeas petition and orders immediate release because re-detention without notice or a hearing violated due process

The Eastern District of California granted Reilandy Gonzalez Moreno’s habeas petition, finding that his re-detention after parole without notice or an opportunity to be heard violated procedural due process and ordering his immediate release.

Uncategorized

Iris Elizabeth Vargas Ponce v. Warden of Adelanto ICE Processing Center, et al. — Re-detention without notice or a pre-deprivation hearing violated due process, requiring immediate release and a limited injunction

A federal magistrate judge granted a habeas petition and ordered the immediate release of a longtime U.S. resident who had been re-detained without notice or a hearing despite having withholding of removal to Honduras, holding that the government must provide seven days’ notice and a pre-depri

Uncategorized

Sandeep Singh v. Tonya Andrews, et al. — Court Grants Habeas Petition and Orders Immediate Release for Lack of Pre-Deprivation Bond Hearing

The Eastern District of California granted Sandeep Singh’s habeas petition and temporary restraining order motion on his due process claim, ordering his immediate release because the government re-detained him without a constitutionally compliant pre-deprivation bond hearing.

Uncategorized

Geronimo Esono Ndong Angue v. Warden, Central Valley Annex Facility — Court grants habeas petition and orders immediate release after two-month delay in custody hearing

The Eastern District of California granted an immigration detainee’s habeas petition and ordered his immediate release, holding that a delay of more than two months in providing a requested custody redetermination hearing violated due process.

Uncategorized

Aaron Huaman Carrera v. Ernesto Santacruz, Jr., et al. — District Court Adopts Recommendation Granting Habeas Relief but Orders Bond Hearing Rather Than Immediate Release

The district court adopted a magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant a habeas petition challenging immigration re-detention, but overruled the petitioner’s objection and ordered a prompt bond hearing before an immigration judge instead of immediate release.

Uncategorized

Ingrid Vanessa Zetino Jaco v. Christopher Chestnut, et al. — Federal Court Orders Immediate Release of Immigrant Detained Without Arrest Warrant or Custody Notice

The court granted a habeas petition and ordered the immediate release of a noncitizen detained by ICE for months without an arrest warrant or notice of custody determination, finding the detention violated statutory and Fifth Amendment due process rights.

Scroll to Top