Weber v. State of Florida — twelve-year sentence affirmed despite requested downward departure
Case Bryan Arthur Weber v. State of Florida Court Florida First District Court of Appeal Judge Winokur, J. Date Decided
Case Bryan Arthur Weber v. State of Florida Court Florida First District Court of Appeal Judge Winokur, J. Date Decided
Case State of Arizona v. Gabriel Paul Horcasitas Court Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One Judge Presiding Judge D. Steven
Case Nicholas Cody Tate v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case In re Christa Gail Pike Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Judge MOORE; GRIFFIN; STRANCH Date
Case United States of America v. Jayson Pastrana-Román Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Judge Rikelman; Kayatta;
Case M. [E] [K], Appeal No. B 25-81.866 Court Court of Cassation, Criminal Chamber (France) Date Decided September 30, 2026
Case Villawood Management Pty Ltd v Marlton Group Pty Ltd Court Federal Court of Australia (Australia) Judge Michael O'Callaghan (appointment
Case Omar Khaled Omar Atia v. Israel Defense Forces—Military Prosecution and the Military Appeals Committee Court Supreme Court of Israel,
Case In re Chatterjee Court Supreme Court of Ohio Judge Kennedy, C.J.; Fischer, J.; DeWine, J.; Brunner, J.; Deters, J.;
Case Christopher Mc Taw v. State of Florida Court Florida Third District Court of Appeal Judge MILLER; LOBREE; BOKOR Date
The Court of Appeal reversed and remanded. It held that section 730.6 gives juvenile courts discretion to award less than full economic loss when compelling and extraordinary reasons support a reduction. A minor’s responsibility and fault are relevant, though the statute does not make ability to pay
The Court of Appeal reversed the kidnapping-for-robbery conviction because the movements inside the home did not satisfy the independent asportation requirement; they were incidental to accomplishing the robbery. It left the false-imprisonment conviction intact because that offense does not require
The Court of Appeal held that attached human hair is part of the body, not personal property under Penal Code section 211. California generally regulates human tissue through specialized statutes rather than ordinary property law, and no statute converts hair severed and taken in a continuous act in
Case Jeffrey D. Gray v. State of Missouri Court Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District Judge Janet Sutton (Mike Parson,
Case State of Hawaiʻi v. Anthony Lee Decker Court Hawaiʻi Intermediate Court of Appeals Judge Karen T. Nakasone (David Y.
Case Larry Thomas Larue a/k/a Larry Larue a/k/a Larry T. Larue v. State of Mississippi Court Mississippi Court of Appeals
The Massachusetts SJC held that joint-venture participation and intent to kill are separate elements, but affirmed three first-degree murder convictions because corrective instructions and overwhelming evidence cured the error.
The Superior Court preserved a restitution contempt finding but reversed a six-month jail sanction because the court did not find beyond a reasonable doubt that Zehr could pay the $3,000 purge amount.
The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed a juvenile’s DOC commitment because Indiana law allowed the juvenile court to consider placement and wardship with the nonparent who had been caring for him.
Case Case of Korkmaz and Others v. Türkiye Court European Court of Human Rights Date Decided 29 September 2026 Citation
Case Case of Parun and Others v. Türkiye Court European Court of Human Rights Date Decided 29 September 2026 Citation
Case Case of Ünal and Others v. Türkiye Court European Court of Human Rights Date Decided 29 September 2026 Citation
Case R v Russo Court Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Canada) Judge Mr. Justice Riley (Minister of Justice Arif
Case Phongpradith v Bieberstein Court Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Canada) Judge Justice Donegan Date Decided September 29, 2026