California Case Summaries
Clear all
Coverage since January 1, 2026

California

Uncategorized

Nieto v. Wal-Mart — C.D. Cal. Holds Cancer-Patient Termination Suit Stays in Federal Court Based on Front and Back Pay Calculation

Central District of California denies remand of a wrongful-termination suit by a former Walmart warehouse worker who took medical leave for cancer treatment, holding that lost wages alone — calculated as 2.5 years of back pay plus 2.5 years of front pay — exceed the federal $75,000 amount-in-controv

Uncategorized

Livingston v. Karl Storz — C.D. Cal. Tosses California Discrimination Claims by Tennessee-Based Remote Worker, Holding FEHA Does Not Reach Out-of-State Employees

Central District of California denies remand and dismisses California FEHA discrimination claims brought by a Tennessee-based remote worker for Karl Storz, holding that FEHA reaches only employees whose situs of employment or material elements of the cause of action are substantially connected to Ca

Uncategorized

Pogosian v. Bowen — C.D. Cal. Issues Preliminary Injunction Barring Re-Detention of Released Immigration Petitioner Without Procedural Protections

Central District of California enters a preliminary injunction barring federal immigration officials from re-detaining petitioner without complying with required procedures, holding the case is not moot under Nielsen v. Preap and that the Winter factors continue to support relief.

Uncategorized

Sorto-Vasquez Kidd v. Wolf — C.D. Cal. Refuses to Stay Ruling Banning ICE “Knock and Talk” Home Arrests Pending Appeal

Central District of California denies the federal government’s motion to stay a partial final judgment that prohibits ICE from entering home curtilage to make warrantless arrests through “knock and talk” encounters, finding the government unlikely to succeed on appeal and unable to show irreparable

Uncategorized

North Investment v. Berkower — C.D. Cal. Tosses Fraud and Aiding-and-Abetting Claims Against Accounting Firm Over False Schedule K-1s

Central District of California dismisses fraud, aiding-and-abetting, and UCL claims against an accounting firm whose Schedule K-1s wrongly indicated investors had received distributions, holding investors did not plausibly allege the firm knew the distributions never occurred when it prepared the fo

Scroll to Top