Barrios Ramirez v. Semaia — five years of supervised liberty requires hearing before re-detention
five years of supervised liberty requires hearing before re-detention.
five years of supervised liberty requires hearing before re-detention.
ICE detainee must receive prompt bond hearing.
government must justify continued immigration detention by clear evidence.
detention without a custody hearing requires immediate release.
prolonged detention of returning permanent resident requires bond hearing.
prior release requires hearing before ICE can detain again.
prior release requires hearing before ICE can detain again.
A federal court rejected dismissal as a procedural sanction but found that pro se homeowners had not pleaded a viable federal mortgage claim.
A federal court rejected dismissal as a procedural sanction but found that pro se homeowners had not pleaded a viable federal mortgage claim.
years of community ties create protected liberty interest.
twelve months of mandatory detention triggers bond hearing.
twelve months of mandatory detention triggers bond hearing.
conditional release creates liberty interest despite pending charges.
conditional release creates liberty interest despite pending charges.
A California federal court lacked personal jurisdiction over a Chinese respondent but could proceed against three specifically identified California hotels to address arbitral awards.
A California federal court lacked personal jurisdiction over a Chinese respondent but could proceed against three specifically identified California hotels to address arbitral awards.
The magistrate judge recommended dismissing claims and defendants that lacked facts showing personal participation, a constitutional deprivation, or a permissible connection to the surviving dispute.
The district court granted the amended habeas petition and ordered release.
The magistrate judge issued amended findings recommending supervised release on substantive due-process grounds.
The magistrate judge recommended denying the government’s threshold dismissal motion but also denying the petition on the merits.
The magistrate judge recommended denying habeas relief.
The magistrate judge recommended immediate release and an injunction against renewed section 1226(a) detention without notice and a pre-deprivation bond hearing.
The magistrate judge recommended release under supervision.
The district court granted habeas relief and emergency relief, concluding that the government violated both its own supervision regulations and procedural due process.