The court dismissed a pro se tenant’s Fair Housing Act sex-discrimination and § 1985 civil-rights conspiracy claims against the owners and managers of her San Diego apartment building, finding her allegations of gender-based animus conclusory and contradicted by her own pleading.
The court denied an emergency motion to bar Immigration and Customs Enforcement from arresting an applicant at her green-card interview at the San Diego USCIS office, finding that even though similar arrests had been documented at the same office, the plaintiff had not shown that arrest was likely i
In a breach-of-contract dispute over a $160,000 fee demand following a cybersecurity vendor’s alleged failure to detect a 2023 data breach at a Georgia orthopedic clinic, the court dismissed the vendor’s counterclaim theories for fraud in the inducement, breach of the implied covenant of
In a federal False Claims Act case alleging that Abbott Laboratories used illegal kickbacks disguised as physician education for its MitraClip heart device, the magistrate judge declined to strike the relator’s late-filed expert report on medical-education standards, finding that even though t
The court granted an immigration detainee’s habeas petition and ordered an individualized bond hearing within seven days, finding him a member of the Bond Eligible Class certified in the Central District’s Maldonado Bautista decision and entitled to detention review under 8 U.S.C. § 1226
The court denied a § 2241 habeas petition by a detained Italian human-trafficking victim seeking immediate release, dismissal of his removal charges, and expedited adjudication of his T-Visa application, ruling that most of the requested relief is not cognizable in habeas and the petitioner offered
The court dismissed three Monell municipal-liability claims against the City of San Diego based on a 2022 wrongful-arrest incident at Mission Beach, ruling that allegations of unrelated SDPD incidents did not establish a longstanding custom, that the failure-to-train theory required a pattern of sim
After the California Supreme Court denied a state habeas petition while the federal stay-and-abey motion was pending, the magistrate judge denied the stay request as moot, finding that the petitioner had now fully exhausted his federal claims because they were substantially equivalent to claims pres
The court compelled arbitration of a former CVS employee’s discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and wage claims, ruling that CVS met its burden of authenticating her electronic signature on a 2017 arbitration agreement and that her bare assertion that her supervisor logged in and signed fo
In a personal-injury case alleging that a recalled bone allograft caused the plaintiff to test positive for tuberculosis, the court denied remand to state court, ruling that the LLC defendant the plaintiff identified as a California citizen was actually a wholly owned subsidiary of a Japanese corpor
The court allowed a serial adult-content copyright plaintiff to issue an early subpoena to an internet service provider for the name and address of a John Doe defendant identified only by IP address, but ordered confidential treatment of any identifying information produced and gave the Doe defendan
The court sua sponte dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction a Russian asylum-seeker’s habeas petition challenging the merits of an immigration officer’s negative credible-fear determination, citing the Supreme Court’s Thuraissigiam decision and 8 U.S.C. § 1252(e)(5).
In a U.S. citizen’s APA action seeking to compel adjudication of his Iraqi mother’s visa application that has been in administrative processing in Amman, Jordan since September 2023, the court denied dismissal of the APA unreasonable-delay claim — declining to apply the TRAC factors at t
After a hearing, the federal court granted the plaintiffs’ motion to remand a wrongful-death case to state court and ordered the removing defendants to pay attorney’s fees, finding their removal lacked an objectively reasonable basis under the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Chi
The court dismissed a federal habeas petition challenging a California Vehicle Code infraction for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that a 30-day driver’s license suspension is a collateral consequence of conviction that does not satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 2254’s requirement that the petitioner be
The court denied a self-represented dentist’s emergency motion to block his landlord from terminating a 21-year tenancy and pursuing state unlawful-detainer proceedings, finding that his § 1983 and ADA claims could not satisfy the most-important Winter factor — likelihood of success on the mer
The court denied without prejudice a Russian asylum-seeker’s habeas petition challenging his immigration detention, ruling that after the Board of Immigration Appeals denied his appeal his detention is governed by the 90-day post-removal-order period in 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a) and a habeas challeng
After a bench trial in a consumer class action against an online skincare seller, the magistrate judge concluded that the seller’s customer-management software vendor was not liable on aiding-and-abetting or conspiracy theories under California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act because the p
After holding an evidentiary hearing, the court denied a federal prisoner’s motion to vacate his sentence for ineffective assistance of counsel, ruling that even though his lawyer miscalculated the sentencing guidelines before trial, the petitioner could not show prejudice because he had alrea
The court remanded a quiet-title and declaratory-relief action concerning San Diego real property to state court under the forum-defendant rule, ruling that the California-based defendants could not remove the case to federal court even though diversity existed and rejecting the defendants’ wa
After remand led to an award of $247,681 in past-due Social Security benefits over eight years, the magistrate judge approved $37,920 in attorney’s fees representing 15.3% of the past-due benefits, finding the resulting $1,700-per-hour effective rate reasonable in light of counsel’s risk
Adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court struck Smith Interface Technologies’ indirect infringement contentions against Apple without leave to amend, finding the contentions failed to provide the specific factual identification required by the Southern Distric
The court ordered the immediate release of a Honduran national who had been on an immigration Order of Supervision since 1999 and detained at his routine annual check-in without notice of revocation or the regulatory interview, ruling that ICE’s failure to follow its own procedures violated du