California Case Summaries
Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since January 1, 2026

California

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Estrada Pelagio v. Modern Floor Specialists — C.D. Cal. Remands Janitor’s FEHA Suit, Rejects Removal Premised on IRCA/Hoffman Defense

Judge Hernán D. Vera remanded a janitor’s FEHA discrimination and wage-and-hour suit to state court, rejecting the employer’s argument that the plaintiff’s possible undocumented status and the IRCA/Hoffman back-pay defense created federal-question jurisdiction under Grable. The cou

U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Uncategorized

Lewis v. BART — N.D. Cal. dismisses wrongful-termination tort against public-entity transit district

Chief Judge Seeborg dismisses without leave to amend a former BART electrician’s common-law wrongful-termination/constructive-discharge claim, holding that under Lopez v. Southern Cal. Rapid Transit District a California public entity cannot be sued in tort without an authorizing statute.

U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Uncategorized

Lipp v. Mixedbread AI — N.D. Cal. tosses conversion and Penal Code § 496 claims in AI co-founder dispute, lets contract claims survive

Magistrate Judge Hixson grants in part Mixedbread AI’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, dismissing AI startup co-founder Julius Lipp’s conversion and California Penal Code § 496 claims under the economic loss rule, while leaving the breach-of-contract counts intact.

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Mora Sandoval v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of GMC Yukon Lemon-Law Suit Where Documented Damages and Repair History Support Civil Penalties

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2021 GMC Yukon lemon-law case, holding GM had no duty to investigate beyond the complaint and the documented $78,776 in actual damages plus civil penalties (twice actual damages, supported by at least five repair attempts) brought the amount in c

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Lopez Lopez v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of Chevy Silverado Lemon-Law Suit Over $54K in Documented Damages Plus Civil Penalties

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2019 Chevy Silverado lemon-law case, holding documented actual damages of $54,232 plus civil penalties (twice actual damages, supported by at least ten repair attempts) brought the amount in controversy to roughly $162,698 — well over the $75,000

U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Uncategorized

Chima v. City and County of San Francisco — N.D. Cal. dismisses second custody-conspiracy suit under domestic-relations abstention

Judge Breyer adopts a magistrate’s report and recommendation dismissing pro se plaintiff Chikodi Chima’s second federal lawsuit against 26 defendants — lawyers, social workers, police, financial institutions, and the City and County of San Francisco — arising from a state-court child custody dispute

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Ascencio v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of Chevy Silverado Lemon-Law Suit Where Mileage Offset Eats Most of Purchase Price But Civil Penalties Push Past $75K

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2022 Chevy Silverado lemon-law suit where actual damages were modest ($34,932) after the mileage offset, but specific willfulness allegations and six repair attempts justified including civil penalties (twice actual damages), bringing the amount

U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Uncategorized

Bryant v. City of Berkeley — N.D. Cal. denies costs to prevailing police defendants in excessive-force shooting case

Magistrate Judge Tse declines to tax costs against Vincent Bryant — an unhoused plaintiff now in a vegetative state after being shot in the face by Berkeley police — applying all five Ninth Circuit factors that justify departing from the Rule 54(d)(1) presumption favoring the prevailing party.

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Mitch C. v. Bisignano — C.D. Cal. Reverses Social Security SSI Denial for Failure to Provide Clear and Convincing Reasons to Discount Schizoaffective Symptom Testimony

Magistrate Judge Maria Audero reversed an SSI denial for a claimant with schizoaffective disorder and depression, holding the ALJ failed to provide specific, clear, and convincing reasons to discount his subjective symptom testimony — and warned that ALJs cannot rely on isolated periods of improveme

U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Uncategorized

Alexander Group v. Comerica Bank — N.D. Cal. enforces commercial loan acceleration over coterminous and financial-reporting defaults

Judge Orrick grants summary judgment for Comerica Bank on its acceleration of a $5.9 million commercial real estate loan to Alexander Group, LLC, holding that the loan documents are unambiguous and that Alexander Group triggered acceleration by missing payments and failing to provide required corpor

U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Uncategorized

Koltys v. Bisignano — N.D. Cal. transfers SSA ALJ’s disability-accommodation suit to Central District

Judge Illston transfers a Social Security ALJ’s disability-accommodation suit against the SSA Commissioner to the Central District of California, where the plaintiff’s assigned hearing office is located, applying the federal-employee venue provisions of Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act and the c

1st District Court of Appeal, Division Three
Uncategorized

In re Fuel Industry Climate Cases — California Has Specific Personal Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Oil Company in Climate-Damages Suit

First District holds California courts may exercise specific personal jurisdiction over Citgo Petroleum in coordinated climate-damages litigation brought by California cities and counties, based on Citgo’s longstanding gasoline supply contracts with California retailers.

4th District Court of Appeal, Division One
Uncategorized

American Medical Response of Inland Empire v. County of San Bernardino — County Had Discretion to Pick a Different EMS Bidder Even When AMR Scored Highest

Fourth District reverses a preliminary injunction that had blocked San Bernardino County from awarding its exclusive EMS contract to a fire-services bidder over incumbent AMR, holding the County retained discretion to weigh proposals and was not required to advance only the highest-scoring bid.

U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
Uncategorized

Tan v. Quick Box — S.D. Cal. Magistrate Finds Konnektive Not Liable on Aiding-and-Abetting CLRA Claims After Bench Trial

After a bench trial in a consumer class action against an online skincare seller, the magistrate judge concluded that the seller’s customer-management software vendor was not liable on aiding-and-abetting or conspiracy theories under California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act because the p

U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
Uncategorized

Sierra Railroad v. Comcast Cable Communications — E.D. Cal. Dismisses Stale Contract Claims, Rejects Equitable Estoppel and Continuous Accrual

Eastern District of California dismisses Sierra Railroad’s contract and declaratory relief claims against Comcast as time-barred under California’s four-year statute of limitations, holding that promises to ‘try’ to resolve a dispute and a continuing failure to pay do not tol

U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
Uncategorized

Baez-Diaz v. United States — S.D. Cal. Denies §2255 Motion Despite Counsel’s Sentencing-Guideline Miscalculation

After holding an evidentiary hearing, the court denied a federal prisoner’s motion to vacate his sentence for ineffective assistance of counsel, ruling that even though his lawyer miscalculated the sentencing guidelines before trial, the petitioner could not show prejudice because he had alrea

U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
Uncategorized

Snow v. ConAgra Brands — E.D. Cal. Grants Summary Judgment Where FEHA Administrative Complaint Lacked Factual Detail

Eastern District of California grants summary judgment for ConAgra in a long-running employment discrimination case, holding that a Civil Rights Department complaint with only conclusory check-box allegations does not exhaust administrative remedies under California’s Fair Employment and Housi

U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Uncategorized

Oracle v. Procore — N.D. Cal. magistrate refines trade-secret disclosure and discovery scope

Magistrate Judge Beeler resolves four discovery disputes in Oracle’s trade-secret suit against Procore over construction-payment software, holding that Oracle’s 174-file disclosure is sufficiently particular, financial discovery extends beyond Procore Pay, and Procore must search text messages on em

U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
Uncategorized

Vue v. Bisignano — E.D. Cal. Vacates SSI Denial, Holds ALJ Failed to Properly Evaluate Treating Physician Opinions

Eastern District of California vacates a Supplemental Security Income denial and remands for further administrative proceedings, holding that the Social Security Administration’s administrative law judge failed to adequately evaluate the supportability of a treating physician’s opinions

U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Uncategorized

Food & Water Watch v. EPA — N.D. Cal. awards $5.76M in fees and costs after fluoride TSCA win

Judge Chen awards Food & Water Watch and its co-plaintiffs $5,263,705 in attorneys’ fees and $496,745 in costs after their landmark Toxic Substances Control Act trial verdict on water-fluoridation risks against EPA, applying San Francisco complex-litigation lodestar rates and a 1.3x multiplier

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Hanna v. Youngquist — C.D. Cal. Dismisses Section 1983 Suit Against Court Reporter Over Family-Law Transcripts With Prejudice

Judge Fernando Aenlle-Rocha dismissed with prejudice a § 1983 suit against a Los Angeles court reporter who allegedly delayed producing family-law transcripts, holding that plaintiff could not show actual prejudice because his underlying state-court cases were barred by the California litigation pri

Scroll to Top