California Case Summaries
Coverage since January 1, 2026

California

Uncategorized

Randolph v. Trustees of California State University — Failure to Object to a Trial Date Past the Five-Year Deadline Is Not an Oral Stipulation to Extend

Third District affirms mandatory dismissal under Code of Civil Procedure section 583.310, holding that a defendant’s failure to object when a trial date is set beyond the five-year (plus emergency-rule six-month) deadline does not amount to an oral stipulation to extend the deadline.

Uncategorized

In re Alpha Beta Gamma Trust — C.D. Cal. Affirms Dismissal of Quiet-Title Suit Against Bankruptcy Trustee on Quasi-Judicial Immunity

Central District of California affirms a bankruptcy court order dismissing a state-court quiet-title suit against a Chapter 7 trustee, holding the trustee was entitled to quasi-judicial immunity for acts approved by the bankruptcy court — even though the Barton doctrine evaporated once the case was

Uncategorized

Suarez v. Nissan — C.D. Cal. Remands Lemon-Law Case as Untimely, Holding Vehicle Price Plus Statutory Penalty Triggered 30-Day Clock at the Complaint

Central District of California remands a Song-Beverly lemon-law suit as untimely removed, holding that a complaint pleading the vehicle’s purchase price and a demand for a civil penalty equal to twice actual damages plainly shows over $75,000 in controversy and starts the 30-day clock at service.

Uncategorized

Ortiz v. General Motors — C.D. Cal. Remands Lemon-Law Case as Untimely After Plaintiff’s Initial Disclosures Made Removability Clear

Central District of California remands a Chevrolet Silverado lemon-law suit as untimely removed, holding that the plaintiff’s initial disclosures — including the sales contract and repair orders — were an “other paper” that started the 30-day clock long before the manufacturer removed.

Uncategorized

City of Gilroy v. Superior Court — Public Records Act Allows Declaratory Relief Even After Records Are Disclosed, but Imposes No Three-Year Retention Duty

The California Supreme Court holds that requesters under the California Public Records Act can sometimes obtain declaratory relief even after the agency has produced everything responsive, but the statute does not impose a three-year duty to preserve records the agency has withheld as exempt.

Uncategorized

Berkeley People’s Alliance v. City of Berkeley — Brown Act Violation Adequately Alleged Where Council Moved Disrupted Meetings to Smaller Room Instead of Clearing the Original

First District reverses dismissal of a Brown Act suit, holding that plaintiffs adequately alleged the Berkeley City Council violated Government Code section 54957.9 by recessing disrupted meetings and reconvening them in a smaller room instead of clearing the original room and continuing in session

Scroll to Top